SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (48415)10/1/2002 1:37:45 AM
From: Bilow  Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Karen Lawrence; Re: "I was just pointing out that relative to Vietnam today, which we stopped occupying 27 years ago, N/S Korea isn't doing as well."

Well, South Korea is doing absolutely magnificently, but you're probably right that if North Korea had absorbed South Korea the later history of the North Korea might have been better. But we weren't giving weapons and assistance to North Korea, LOL.

Re: "I think Vietnam was a mistake."

So do I, nowadays. But I didn't think it at the time. It's easy to get caught up in conflict. What's the classic phrase, "he hit me back first" or something like that.

-- Carl



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (48415)10/1/2002 7:35:02 AM
From: aladin  Respond to of 281500
 
Karen,

I would suggest a trip to N&S Vietnam and N&S Korea. I have to admit that I have not been to N Korea, but in general I think you will find that South Korea is doing much better than the other 3.

If its your thesis that we should have abandoned the South then you are way off base. Unlike Vietnam which started out as a Truman fiasco (abandoning allies and handing a colony back to the French and starting a chain of events mostly nationalistic in nature), Korea was independent post WW2. The North was then a sponsored regime in the Cold War and Nationalism had nothing to do with it.

I suspect if we had walked away from Korea, the South would look like the North.

John