SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (60444)10/1/2002 11:12:45 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
One stands in a position of trust to various people, for example,
one's spouse. Anyone who relies upon one has a right to question one's
behavior as it affects his interests. This is merely an extrapolation from one's
duty to act with discretion in handling matters that other's have a stake in. One
should be careful not to cause undo disquiet, and therefore should be willing
to clear the air if a problem comes up.


Well, let's see.

Starting with Rand's premise that all actions are selfish, I have to see whether it is in my best interests to accept that I have a duty to act with discretion in handling matters that others have a stake in. I can't see it. Just because you may have some sort of stake in the way I post here doesn't, IMO, mean that I have a duty to act with discretion in my posting. I may have a desire to do so if I want to keep communicating with you, and I fear you will go away if I act indiscretely. But a duty and a desire are very different things.

Duties arise from somewhere. I agree that in marrying I voluntarily accepted a set of duties. In fathering children I voluntarily accepted a set of duties. But I don't think that in posting here I accepted any set of duties other than to obey the TOU. Perhaps you will explain to me the bosis of any duty I have to act with discretion just because other people claim some stake in what I do?