SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (3815)10/2/2002 10:32:27 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Imagis SEC filing offers financing details and more

2002-10-02 06:18 PT - Street Wire

IN THE DETAILS

by Lee M. Webb

Imagis Technologies Inc., a Vancouver biometric player, has filed a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with shares and warrants issued to OSI Systems Inc. pursuant to a $1.75-million (U.S.) brokered private placement disclosed on July 9. Imagis trades on the TSX Venture Exchange, the Frankfurt Exchange and the OTC Bulletin Board.

The prospectus in the 74-page SEC registration statement filed on Sept. 23 covers the sale of an aggregate of 1,458,334 Imagis shares by OSI. U.S.-based OSI acquired 1,166,667 Imagis shares and 291,667 warrants exercisable at $1.50 (U.S.) over two years in the brokered July financing. Deepak Chopra, OSI's chairman and chief executive officer, was appointed to Imagis's board of directors on July 8.

The Sept. 23 SEC filing fleshes out some of the details of the $1.75-million (U.S.) financing. Among other things, the subscription agreement with OSI provides for an adjustment to the purchase price through the issuance of additional shares to OSI, if Imagis, with some unspecified exceptions, enters into another financing prior to July 9, 2003, at a price less than $1.50 (U.S.) per share. A similar adjustment would apply to the warrants, offering OSI at least some protection against a possible dilutive financing.

The likelihood that Imagis will have to go back to the well for some additional financing before July of next year appears to be quite high. The prospectus notes that the company's auditors have expressed substantial doubt about Imagis's ability to continue as a going concern. Through the first six months of the year, Imagis reported revenue of $2.05-million and expenses of $4.85-million, ringing up a loss of approximately $2.8-million and boosting its accumulated deficit to approximately $13-million as of June 30. The company had cash and short-term investments totalling $1.22-million at the end of the second quarter.

"We may require additional financing to fund our operations which may not be available to us," Imagis acknowledges in its latest SEC filing. "Our revenue is not sufficient to finance our operating expenses and capital requirements. Based upon current estimates, we believe we have sufficient capital to fund our requirements through the end of 2002. Accordingly, we will require additional financing to fund our capital requirements and operating activities. We do not have any current arrangements with respect to other potential sources of financing and we cannot assure you that we will be able to secure financing on favorable terms or at all."

In addition to providing OSI with some dilution protection under the subscription agreement, Imagis entered into a number of other agreements with OSI in connection with the $1.75-million (U.S.) financing. Those agreements carry a minimum price tag of $750,000 (U.S.).

Under a July 8 product development and marketing agreement, Imagis formed a strategic alliance with OSI to develop integrated airport and transportation security products. The agreement involves the commitment of a minimum of $250,000 (U.S.) to operate an internal transportation security group and develop the products. Imagis will receive an unspecified royalty for all sales made by OSI of the products developed under the agreement.

Imagis also entered into a software developer services agreement with OSI on July 8. Under that agreement, Imagis will engage the services of OSI software engineers and equipment in OSI's facility in Hyderabad, India. Imagis has committed to pay OSI a minimum of $250,000 (U.S.) under the agreement expiring on June 30, 2003.

Another $250,000 (U.S.) is earmarked under a July 8 joint venture letter of intent with OSI. Under that letter of intent, upon the establishment of a Brazilian company by OSI to handle marketing of products in Brazil, Imagis will invest $250,000 (U.S.) for a 20-per-cent stake in that entity.

According to the prospectus, Imagis also signed a letter agreement with OSI that "memorializes each parties' rights with respect to each other relating to their investment rights in Zixsys Inc." The specific details of that letter agreement are not disclosed.

Imagis has been touting an association with Japanese giant Sanyo Semiconductor Company through Zixsys, previously identified as SecurityART Inc., since January of this year. On Jan. 23, along with associated company Intacta Technologies Inc., Imagis announced that it had signed a memorandum of understanding to form a new venture with six subsidiaries and affiliates of Sanyo. By March the new venture was named SecurityART. According to the March 12 Imagis news release, SecurityART was initially capitalized with approximately $1.5-million (U.S.) provided by the Sanyo subsidiaries and affiliates, but Imagis and Intacta reported that they would also participate in the equity of the new venture.

On May 21, Imagis reported that it had licensed its facial recognition technology to the Japanese venture, renamed Zixsys. The licensing fee was not disclosed, nor was the royalty structure revealed. At the time, Imagis claimed that it intended to complete its investment and become a shareholder of Zixsys within three months. More than five months after that news release, Imagis has yet to announce whether it has completed its investment in Zixsys.

It is not clear what investment rights OSI might have with respect to the Japanese venture or how those rights might impact Imagis's long-awaited investment in Zixsys. Imagis's associated company, Intacta, has been silent with respect to its proposed equity stake in Zixsys for many months. Chaired by Imagis founder and current director Altaf Nazerali, cash-starved Intacta is struggling to stay afloat.

Meanwhile, Imagis continues to play the Sanyo-related face card. On Oct. 1, Imagis announced that Zixsys, identified as a Sanyo subsidiary, will be displaying its ID Controller at an exhibition in Japan. The Zixsys product incorporates a proximity card reader and an optical fingerprint sensor in addition to Imagis's facial recognition technology.

Beyond the disclosures regarding some of the fine print surrounding the $1.75-million (U.S.) financing, Imagis's Sept. 23 SEC filing offers other interesting snippets for investors willing to plough through the 74-page document and compare it with earlier filings. For example, Imagis's leased Vancouver office space seems to have mushroomed.

In its annual report for the year ending Dec. 31, 2001, which was filed on March 21, 2002, Imagis reported that it was subleasing "an approximately 800 square foot facility" as the company's West Georgia St. headquarters in Vancouver. The monthly rent on that pricey space was a whopping $10,000 payable to International Portfolio Management Inc., a company controlled by Mr. Nazerali. Stockwatch called attention to that exorbitant rent in a March 25 article.

According to Imagis's latest SEC filing, the company still pays $10,000 per month for its Vancouver office space, however it is getting more bang, or space, for its buck. Imagis now reportedly has the run of 5,000 square feet in the same building. The Sept. 23 filing does not disclose who is collecting the rent for the company's recently expanded office space.

The Sept. 23 SEC filing also discloses the holdings of Imagis insiders. The snapshot of insider holdings as of Sept. 16 may be of particular interest in light of recent Stockwatch reports of late insider filings and Imagis's Sept. 27 response to a Sept. 23 article.

Stockwatch stands by the substantive facts in the Sept. 23 article in light of information available at the time. As Stockwatch reported, and as Imagis subsequently acknowledged in its response to the article, Mr. Nazerali did not file an insider report disclosing a Nov. 14, 2001, transaction until Sept. 17, 2002. Imagis correctly points out that Mr. Nazerali did include a transaction code on the hard copy of his late filing, but that code was not published on the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) Web site.

Stockwatch also reported on Sept. 23 that Imagis director Treyton Thomas was late in filing an insider trading report. On Sept. 27, Imagis reported that Mr. Thomas's filing was early, not late. However, Stockwatch's report was based on information provided by Mr. Thomas prior to the publication of the article and information available on the BCSC Web site.

On Sept. 21, two days before Stockwatch published the report, Mr. Thomas informed Stockwatch that after consulting with Leon Getz, a highly regarded securities lawyer, he had determined that he was in fact late in filing an insider report. Mr. Thomas provided a copy of the report he submitted to the BCSC on Sept. 20, disclosing a transaction that reportedly occurred on July 31. The BCSC published that report on its Web site. Moreover, a copy of the original report obtained from the BCSC includes the handwritten notation "Late," initialed by a BCSC official.

As reported by Imagis on Sept. 27, the options granted to Mr. Thomas were not accepted for filing by the TSX until Sept. 23. On Sept. 30, Mr. Thomas filed an amended insider report with the BCSC. Based on the information that is now available, Mr. Thomas's initial insider report was filed prematurely. Stockwatch is still reviewing the Imagis insider trading muddle and wider issues involving the role of regulators in ensuring the transparency of a system that is held to be a key element of continuous disclosure.

As previously reported by Stockwatch, Altaf Nazerali, Oliver "Buck" Revell and Deepak Chopra have been late in filing insider reports. In addition to Mr. Nazerali's late report involving 100,000 options, a review of insider reports filed since last November shows that the Imagis founder and current director acquired 60,000 options on Dec. 19, 2001, but did not report the transaction until May 15, 2002.

Andy Amanovich, Imagis's chief technology officer, has also been tardy in filing an insider report. According to hard copies of filings obtained from the BCSC, Mr. Amanovich exercised 30,000 options priced at $1 on July 12, but did not report the transaction until Aug. 8. Stockwatch is reviewing other filings.

While Imagis's Sept. 23 SEC filing provides a snapshot of insider holdings as of Sept. 16, it also raises some questions. For example, Iain Drummond, Imagis's president and chief executive officer, is reportedly the beneficial owner of 307,500 shares, according to the SEC filing. A note discloses that Mr. Drummond's reported beneficial holdings include "300,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options and warrants that are exercisable within 60 days of Sept. 16" but excludes 383,334 shares issuable upon the exercise of options that are not exercisable within 60 days of Sept. 16.

According to BCSC records of Mr. Drummond's holdings prior to the latest SEC filing, Imagis's president purchased 7,500 shares at $1.29 per share on Feb. 4, 2000; was granted 100,000 options exercisable at $1 on Sept. 24, 2001; and acquired 400,000 warrants exercisable at $1.25 on Feb. 23, 1999. Mr. Drummond's warrants were to expire in three equal amounts on Feb. 23, 2001, 2002 and 2003, if unexercised, but Imagis twice extended the expiry date on the Feb. 23, 2001 and Feb. 23, 2002, tranches. According to the latest extension announced in a June 24 news release, 266,666 warrants were set to expire on Aug. 31.

Given Mr. Drummond's reported holdings according to the Sept. 23 SEC filing and the absence of any insider report to the contrary, it appears that he did not exercise the 266,666 warrants priced at $1.25 that were set to expire at the end of August. If the warrants did expire unexercised, also a reportable event, that fact has not been disclosed in a BCSC insider trading report.

The SEC filing also invites questions regarding possibly different reporting formats between the SEC and the BCSC. According to the Sept. 23 SEC filing, Imagis director Roy Trivett had beneficial ownership of 283,468 shares as of Sept. 16. A subsequent note discloses that his beneficial ownership includes 166,668 shares issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable within 50 days of Sept. 16, 45,000 common shares held by Trivett Holdings and 22,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by Trivett Holdings. Mr. Trivett's reported holdings do not include 83,332 shares issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days of Sept. 16.

According to BCSC filings, Trivett Holdings, controlled by Mr. Trivett, acquired 45,000 special warrants priced at $2.17 per special warrant in an Imagis private placement last November. Each special warrant was convertible into one share and one-half of a share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable at $2.55 for one year. While the specific reference in the SEC filing to 45,000 common shares held by Trivett Holdings seems to suggest that the 45,000 special warrants were converted, the BCSC does not have an insider report disclosing such a transaction. It is not clear whether the special warrants were actually converted or if this is simply a matter of different reporting formats.

In addition to the holdings of Mr. Drummond and Mr. Trivett, the SEC filing discloses that Mr. Nazerali beneficially owns 715,167 shares, including 261,667 shares issuable upon the exercise of options and 136,000 shares held by International Portfolio Management, but excluding 63,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days of Sept. 16. Mr. Revell beneficially owns 185,000 shares, including 148,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days, but excluding 12,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days of Sept. 16. Mr. Thomas beneficially owns 100,000 shares, including 100,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options, but excluding 200,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days of Sept. 16.

Imagis director Robert Gordon beneficially owns 60,000 shares, representing shares issuable upon the exercise of options. Wayne Smith, the company's chief financial officer, reportedly owns 8,333 shares, representing shares issuable upon the exercise of options, but excluding 16,667 shares issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days of Sept. 16. It is not clear when Mr. Smith was granted options, but he has not yet filed an insider report with the BCSC.

Former director Fred Clarke reportedly has beneficial ownership of more than 1.9 million shares. The bulk of those shares, more than 1.6 million, are indirectly held through Pacific Cascade Consultants Ltd. Mr. Clarke controls FWC Ltd., which owns 50 per cent of Pacific Cascade, with the other 50 per cent owned by Mr. Amanovich. Including his indirect holdings along with Mr. Clarke in Pacific Cascade, Mr. Amanovich beneficially owns more than 2.05 million shares.

(Pacific Cascade filed a lawsuit against Kerstin Loesch in the Supreme Court of British Columbia on June 4, seeking the return of 500,000 Imagis shares. According to both the lawsuit and BCSC filings, Ms. Loesch shares the same address as Shafiq Nazerali-Walji, an Imagis consultant. Mr. Nazerali-Walji is the brother of Mr. Nazerali. According to Imagis, the dispute was resolved to the mutual satisfaction of the parties. No further court documents were filed. Imagis officially announced Mr. Clarke's resignation from the company's board of directors on July 9.)

Mr. Chopra, the beneficial owner of more than 1.45 million shares represented by OSI's holdings, rounds out the Imagis insiders. According to the SEC filing, Imagis's officers and directors beneficially own 5.17 million shares, representing 24.8 per cent of the outstanding shares as of Sept. 16.

According to a Sept. 12 open letter to shareholders, Imagis estimates that it has more than 3,500 shareholders. If Imagis indeed has that many shareholders, then the average holdings, excluding the holdings of the nine officers and directors, clocks in at approximately 4,000 shares.

While curious shareholders may be wading through Imagis's latest SEC filing, some perhaps searching for the devil in the details, others may be more closely watching the recent rally in the stock price. In the last three trading sessions on the TSX, Imagis has gained 40 cents. Imagis closed at $1.68 on Oct. 1.

Comments regarding this article may be sent to lwebb@stockwatch.com.

(More information regarding Imagis Technologies is available in Canada Stockwatch articles published on March 7, 11, 15, 25, 27 and 28; April 2, 9 and 16; May 17, 23 and 30; June 4, 11, 18, 26 and 28; July 3, 12 and 18; and Sept. 12, 13, 16, 20, 23, 24 and 27, 2002.)



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (3815)10/2/2002 3:04:57 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Rocky Mountain Energy Corporation Obtains Temporary Restraining Order to Recover 8 Million Stolen Shares

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 2, 2002--Rocky Mountain Energy Corporation (OTCBB:RMEC) announced today that it has obtained a temporary restraining order in Salt Lake County Utah district court to freeze the account of Salvatore Russo, SOS Resources and related parties at Westminster Securities (broker), Phillip Louis Trading, Inc. and Hill Thompson Magid, LP (market makers). The action was taken to protect the public from the aggressive selling of 8,000,000 shares of company stock allegedly stolen by certain defendants in the action.

"We cannot allow our shareholders to be affected by stolen shares," said John N. Ehrman, president and CEO of Rocky Mountain Energy Corporation. "A Temporary Restraining Order to freeze the account and stop the sale of the stolen shares was obtained in a suit filed by RMEC against Salvatore Russo, SOS Resources, George Malina, Ronald Brooks and Marathon USA Corporation for fraud, securities fraud, conspiracy, racketeering, and disposing of stolen assets. The suit requests restitution of the shares and other relief." Westminster Securities, Phillip Louis Trading, Inc. and Hill Thompson Magid, LP are likewise defendants.

The Temporary Restraining Order prohibits any further sale of RMEC's securities from the accounts, or the use of the account to short RMEC stock.

"We took decisive action to maintain our shareholder value and return the market to normal conditions," said Ehrman. "Out of 9.3 million shares estimated in the float, freezing an estimated 6,000,000 shares remaining should return us as near to normal conditions as possible. The shares disposed of by Russo et al must be returned to the company as they were stolen without compensation to the company. Our shareholders have been damaged and the shares must be returned as the sales were illegal. Our investors will be able to focus on our oil and gas operations to enhance shareholder value with the confidence that the illegal activity has ceased."

In June 2002 RMEC entered into a credit agreement for $40 million with Marathon USA Corporation. The introduction to Marathon and Mr. Ron Brooks was made by George Malina who was originally brought to the company by Mr. Salvatore Russo of SOS Resources. A fee of $100,000 was paid to Marathon and 8,000,000 shares of stock issued to Marathon in contemplation of the closing of the loan. In late August 2002 a $3,000,000 check written by Marathon to the escrow in order to close an acquisition was returned "NSF" or nonsufficient funds. No attempt to make the check good has been made.

It was found that the due diligence materials provided to RMEC to induce it to pay over to Marathon $100,000 and the free trading shares were false and had been "cut and pasted" including a forged audit ostensibly by "Ernst & Young" and letters from Union Bank of Switzerland -- all of which were found to be false.

It was also discovered that Mr. Russo and Mr. Malina received a fee out of the $100,000 stolen by Marathon USA Corporation. Further investigation disclosed that 1.3 million of the 8,000,000 shares of stock escrowed in contemplation of the Marathon closing had been disposed of by Russo prior to the recent "dumping" estimated at 1.5 to 2 million shares.

Russo had an agreement to do investor relations with Marathon. In an effort to extricate itself from any party associated with Marathon, RMEC notified Russo that the shares needed to be returned to RMEC. Russo threatened to sell all of the shares on the market at once resulting in a major loss of shareholder value. Although RMEC notified Westminster Securities (Russo's broker), Phillip Louis Trading, Inc. and Hill Thompson Magid, LP (market makers) that they were selling stolen shares, over 2,000,000 shares were believed sold or "dumped" on the open market in a three-day period. According to RMEC, a source at Hill Thompson confirmed on Friday, Sept. 27, 2002, that they had 7,000,000 shares to sell with instructions to flood the market and "worry about the legalities later."

For further information call John N. Ehrman at 281/448-6500.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: This report contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of its management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to its management. When used in this report, the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan" and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management's current view of the company with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this report as anticipated, estimated or expected.

CONTACT:

Rocky Mountain Energy Corporation, Houston

John N. Ehrman, 281/448-6500

SOURCE: Rocky Mountain Energy Corporation

Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page. URL: businesswire.com

10/02/2002 14:57 EASTERN



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (3815)10/2/2002 3:22:07 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 12465
 
RE: DAN7 gives his condolences to Xybernaut shareholders

By: dan7
02 Oct 2002, 02:14 PM EDT Msg. 60566 of 60566

My condolences for those that put their hard earned money into this stock. I personally think that what is around the near term corner will surprise many. XYBR, or any other stock, does not have such a rapid and sudden decline without a major underlying reason. This reason, in my opinion, will soon be announced or discovered. In the event XYBR is unable to raise funds, similar to the recent General Magic announcement, this does not mean that any and/or all liabilities are cut-off along with the telephones and electric. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been lost by almost 60,000 shareholders, WHY? The reason for these losses are quite apparent to me, and from what I have seen posted recently, many others also. I will be clarifying exactly what I mean, as the days become shorter and shorter.

ragingbull.lycos.com