Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SOROS who wrote (7670)	10/1/2002 3:31:44 PM
From: habitrail	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Where? I want to read it! We should not let it go to waste.

To: SOROS who wrote (7670)	10/1/2002 3:49:43 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

got him suspended Oh, Gawd. He seemed so mellow lately. Well, you know, mellow for Jim. Until Friday. lurqer

To: SOROS who wrote (7670)	10/1/2002 7:09:51 PM
From: pogbull	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

<<Jim gave a tongue-lashing to someone on another thread, and it got him suspended until Friday. If he sends anything of major importance, I will post it.>> Without reservation I give my full support to Jim. My guess is that some rude lesbian must have complained about the "tongue-lashing" he gave her. <g> Hang in there Jim, perhaps we should have a backup thread on Ihub??? SI tends to suspend some of their brightest posters, Slider has been the victim of several such suspensions in the past. This makes no sense to me, can't these offended heel biters use the ignore feature? Why doesn't SI suspend posters like "gold tutor" for promoting some rinky dink rip off little business on SI? As a lifetime subscriber to SI, I am upset. I feel that I benefit from the work that Jim shares with us. Now I lose that benefit because some thin skinned little puke picks a fight and gets their feelings hurt. This is wrong. I support Jim.