Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (303043)	10/1/2002 4:17:16 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

why shouldn't it be good enough for TP? You sure are long on the accusations and short on the facts. Where did I say the law should be reinterpreted?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (303043)	10/1/2002 4:21:41 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"When the law is inconvenient, we shall simply reinterpret it to get the result we want" Believe me, I understand the demo viewpoint well. The 2000 election was a real eye opener for me. Even though I was a grown adult when this came up and follow the news fairly closely, I had no idea the demorats looked at the law this way. Clinton was a perfect leader for them imo. Before the election I thought it was more of a personal issue with him as opposed the the system wide viewpoint held by the demos. I hope they get their asses handed to them on a plate in November so we can get judges that follow the constitution. Never realized how important this was until Gore bastardized the election. The Torecelli decision is going to NJ's Supreme Court. Sure hope they are better at this than Florida.