SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (48673)10/1/2002 8:35:32 PM
From: Rascal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
So the experts are wrong?

Links please



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (48673)10/1/2002 9:03:29 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Nadine Carroll; Re: "The author of these piece blithely ignores the fact that Saddam Hussein has been portraying himself as a pious Muslim, not a secular leader, for the last ten years."

In the West, we consider it possible for a man to be a secular leader and a pious Christian at the same time, with no conflict of interest. Saddam's situation is similar. Iraq is not an Islamic Republic, and the fact is that Tariq Aziz is still a Christian, not a Moslem.

-- Carl



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (48673)10/1/2002 9:28:55 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
The author of these piece blithely ignores the fact that Saddam Hussein has been portraying himself as a pious Muslim, not a secular leader, for the last ten years.

Some interesting quotes are relevant here:

"As for its (Iraq) involvement with al-Qa'eda, there have been connections between the groups, but these have been (as best we can tell) tenuous and inconsequential."

"It remains to be seen, however, whether Saddam would be willing to risk such serious consequences to provide more active support to al-Qa'eda and whether bin Laden's Muslim fundamentalists would be willing to collaborate with a mullah-killing secularist like Saddam."

Pages 155-158 in Pollock.