Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (171401)	10/2/2002 10:51:54 AM
From: NITT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

re:"We're now talking 12 years ago" We are talking about 11 years since the cease-fire. 8 of those years were under Clinton who was busy with some personal problems. Clinton did get a very strong resolution from Congress in 1998 including the democrats, but didn't push the issue because he was trying to make a legacy for himself in the middle east on the Israel - Palestine front. The biggest change in 11 years is 9-11 and what weapons of mass destruction in the wrong hands could do. re"Now we are acting on a perceived threat. " We have not acted, we are threatening to act... this is what appears to be the only thing that gets through to Saddam. I think their is some hop that others will come to the table and offer to join with the rest of the world in peaceful coexistence... we se how well the north Korean and Iranian systems work today. re"I suspect that Bush will settle only for "regime change". I think the Bush administration feels he will not comply and they will be justified. I think that if he does comply it is only a matter of time before his people turn on him. If the UN has any spine, they will set some consequences for failure to comply... if they do not, he will not comply. Nitt