SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cavan who wrote (3263)10/2/2002 12:12:20 PM
From: scaram(o)ucheRespond to of 4974
 
>> Didn't jump in <<

Good news! Thanks for letting me know.



To: cavan who wrote (3263)12/4/2002 2:30:47 PM
From: scaram(o)ucheRespond to of 4974
 
$3. (eom)



To: cavan who wrote (3263)1/10/2003 10:25:26 AM
From: scaram(o)ucheRespond to of 4974
 
$3 again and again. So..... as shaken as we were, all but a few of the world's wealthiest folk could have gone over-weight and taken home 50-100%.

It only took faith.

Which I didn't have.

;-(



To: cavan who wrote (3263)1/13/2003 3:44:04 PM
From: scaram(o)ucheRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 4974
 
$4.

:-)



To: cavan who wrote (3263)5/22/2003 9:51:37 AM
From: scaram(o)ucheRespond to of 4974
 
$5.

Wow.

Jerry...... last post rubbing my nose in this. Sure wish that I'd have added to my call position, but (1) I didn't have the guts, (2) there was the little issue of betrayal by management, and (3) I didn't have the guts.

:-)

Wow, wow, wow.



To: cavan who wrote (3263)5/23/2003 10:03:26 AM
From: scaram(o)ucheRespond to of 4974
 
I lied. $6. Wow. (eom)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News