Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SeachRE who wrote (303313)	10/2/2002 12:49:03 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

"911 scumbags were murderers. They killed INNOCENT people and must never be viewed as "martyrs" regardless of any Dictionary definition" Then why do you attack me if our opinions are the same? Why does it not bother you that Ray DOES refer to them as "martyrs". If you insist on sticking up for him using the term at the same time that you say they NEVER should be referred to as "martyrs", you are just a stupid hypocrit. You should condemn Ray's use, but you are birds of the same feather, so you must stick up for your friend Ray and attack me as your enemy EVEN THOUGH WE FEEL THE SAME WAY ABOUT THE ISSUE (per your words above). Also - why not help me explain that JF is wrong on this issue also? My guess is that you are more concerned about the personalities than the issues. You like (or at least support) Ray (and JF too?), but hate me. And we feel the same way about the issue. Weird. "Although, what Ray said is being taken out of context by a scumbag such as yourself" I asked you yesterday to show how I am taking it out of context. Of course you will not give a reason. Just a restatement of your incorrect premise. Ray will not say how it is out of context either. You said it was a joke by Ray. I would like to see how you come to this conclusion. That you will stick up for him and call me names based on my questioning him shows your real intent imo.

To: SeachRE who wrote (303313)	10/2/2002 1:16:08 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

<< Their hitting the Pentagon may be another matter. >> All nations need self defense, in the form of military or police. You are implying that it is OK for a gang of terrorists to strike at a peaceful nation's self defense, and to murder members of a peaceful nation's military?

To: SeachRE who wrote (303313)	10/2/2002 4:45:34 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Hey scumbag, could you elaborate on your comment? You said: Their hitting the Pentagon may be another matter. What other matter? GZ

To: SeachRE who wrote (303313)	10/2/2002 5:15:04 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

SearchRE, Thanks for pointing our reality to Srexley. I don't hold out any hope though that he will end his deliberate distortions however. He's the sort who prefers to lie rather than tell the truth. It looks like we've got total consistency in the matter of the "BUSH fade". Everytime Bush opens his mouth, Wall Street crashes. Today was no exception. It does make you wonder what the RWEs around here really want. Their portfolios have all been devastated by the Bush team, if they've been long the markets. My struggle is to create the sort of benign and peaceful environment where I can grow my investment portfolio. I tend to see the RWEs as idiots who can't see how destructive Bush is for their own opportunities to thrive in the capital markets. They seem completely blind to the fact that their own greed is being ground into the dirt as Bush madly lusts after his world domination scheme. If there's one thing the disappoints me, it's an RWE who's too dumb to realize he's being played for the sucker by Bush in his game of world oil poker. -Ray