Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (152811)	10/2/2002 8:37:51 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1586708

RE:"What do you think the Reps. will do if Torricelli resigns from the Senate......sue the state" First thing is that there are other people on the ballot besides Forrester and Toricelli. Secondly. Had Toricelli been ahead in the polls he likely wouldn't have quit. Torricelli should have quit months ago. He hung everyone out to dry. I think he should run on his own merits. All this last ditch stuff is just a sour grapes ploy. NJ voted him in, let them vote him back in. Jim

To: tejek who wrote (152811)	10/2/2002 8:42:35 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586708

How do you feel about this Ted? Message 18061195

To: tejek who wrote (152811)	10/2/2002 10:57:59 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586708

Once again what happened to the Reps. states' rights platform? Do you think that supporting states' rights means that when a state court makes a politically-motivated incorrect decision there should not be an appeal to a federal court? Why have a Supreme Court at all? This is a stupid argument. Damned near half the court had made substantial contributions to the Torricelli campaign and if they had an ounce scruples would have recused themselves. (I know -- it is a funny concept -- Democrats with scruples).