Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (152866)	10/3/2002 10:11:30 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1586861

What a pain in the ass.......when I posted earlier he had been found guilty of fraud. I didn't learn that the guilty verdict had been overturned until after both posts to you had been made. And lest you want to argue the definition of convicted.....look it up in Websters before posting back. 1. When a conviction is overturned, the person convicted is NOT a felon. Really? Did you ever stop to think that I did not know the verdict had been overturned. A few weeks ago he had been found guilty........I had no idea a Rep. judge was planning to over turn the conviction. 2. If you were as interested in the truth as you are trying to find a spec of dirt against a Republican to offset the truckloads of mud Democrats have heaped upon themselves, then you would KNOWN the conviction was overturned well before you posted the misrepresentative statement. You really are working this; trying to look stupider than you really are. BTW you don't want me to start looking for dirt on the Reps.........this thread wouldn't be big enough to handle it all.