SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Shread who wrote (55312)10/3/2002 4:13:18 PM
From: bcrafty  Respond to of 209892
 
Yep, maybe they just blew it

From today's New York Times about the incident:

"Such large orders would not usually be entered electronically. Instead, a brokerage firm might call other institutions to find buyers, and then report the trade. Or it might try to work the order, selling smaller parts while keeping confidential how many more shares were available.

The Bear, Stearns order showed up as orders to sell 50,000 shares of numerous stocks, according to a person briefed on what occurred. Apparently traders questioned the orders, and that led to the discovery of the mistake. It was not disclosed how soon the order was canceled.

The obvious impact on the market was obscured by the fact that stocks were already sharply lower. But the S.& P. 500, at 829.57 at 3:40 p.m., fell more than 3 points within five minutes. It recovered about half that amount by the close of trading at 4 p.m"



To: Paul Shread who wrote (55312)10/3/2002 4:28:14 PM
From: ajtj99  Respond to of 209892
 
Wow, that's an eye opener! That appears to make more sense than the other crap they've been talking.