SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (60989)10/4/2002 9:18:28 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
As long as you don't actually exterminate people, or incite other people to do it, you have every right in a free society to hold those views. Of course if you espouse them in public other people will revile you, or may revile you, which is as it should be in a free marketplace of ideas. Freedom means nothing if it does not mean we are free to hold thoughts "repugnant" to others. Think how repugnant the Catholics were to the Protestants, and vice versa. Plenty of Protestants thought Catholics should be exterminated and vice versa. So when this country was founded, our leaders recognized that repugnance is in the eye of the beholder, and that there are many many eyes, some of them vicious. But even the vicious eye has a right to its vicious opinions, as long as it doesn't overstep the generous bounds of free speech.



To: Neocon who wrote (60989)10/4/2002 11:02:15 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
The belief is any person's right to hold.

Acting on it in criminal ways is not.

That is the clear distinction. I trust it is a distinction you can recognize and respect.

It appears to me, if I understand your last posts correctly, that you believe there are certain ideas which people should be forbidden to hold. Is that in fact your view?