SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (304429)10/4/2002 4:10:05 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
State Supreme courts aren't part of the Rule of Law?

Steve



To: jlallen who wrote (304429)10/4/2002 4:13:44 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
JLA, you certainly know that state statutes are interpreted by the state supreme court. The New Jersey statute, in question, did not expressly prohibit a change in candidates in the 51 day period leading up to the election. The same stature did not prohibit a candidate from withdrawing in that period. The New Jersey court simply interpreted the statute according to legislative intent.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News