SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (304439)10/4/2002 4:20:50 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
<unlike sore/losermen, I'll live with the result of the appeal to the highest court.>>

Didn't Gore concede and declare Bush his Commander and Chief once the USSC had ruled?

Steve



To: jlallen who wrote (304439)10/4/2002 4:24:33 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
No equal protection argument. The Republican brief is not even making an equal protection argument. They are making a "due process" argument which was only supported by the Rehnquist 3 in Bush v. Gore. They need a 4th judge to get a grant of Certiorari.



To: jlallen who wrote (304439)10/4/2002 5:14:51 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769670
 
Has any link been posted to the actual law?? I think you summed it and I'd guess the SC would vote as you suggest. But as you say, what will be will and I'll not complain, whine, snivel like our lefty loony toon posters.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News