SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (80783)10/7/2002 12:48:09 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
IN THE MONEY: Genemax Battles The Shorts, Who Benefits?

By Steven D. Jones and Carol S. Remond
1,439 words
7 October 2002
11:25
Dow Jones

A Dow Jones Newswires Column

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Try the smell test on this one.

Biotech company GeneMax Corp. (GMXX) volubly protests short sellers
attacking its stock.

But trading restrictions on most GeneMax shares plus legal action by the
company against selected brokerages used by short sellers have enabled
GeneMax to control the float in its stock, or the number of shares free to
trade. The result is that the group with the largest block of tradable
shares is Investors Communication Inc., or ICI, a management firm with close
ties to GeneMax.

As the price of GeneMax has risen to $8 from $4 in early September, ICI has
seen the value of its 580,000 GeneMax shares and 1 million options climb to
more than $12 million. But while most of GeneMax's founding shareholders are
restricted from trading their shares, ICI is free to exercise and sell its
options.

In an interview Friday, GeneMax director and ICI consultant Grant Atkins
confirmed that ICI held options on 1 million shares and those options could
be exercised at any time, but he said ICI wouldn't do so. "ICI has a
contract with GeneMax to provide a wide range of services, and it does not
want to have a negative impact on the company," Atkins said.

A pooling agreement locks up 9.1 million of GeneMax's 15.2 million
outstanding shares. Rule 144 restrictions apply to all but 268,000 shares
that remain free to trade, Atkins said. Nevertheless, 1 million shares of
the stock changed hands in August, or about 52,000 daily. In September,
turnover rose to 1.16 million, or about 56,500 shares daily.

The recent rise in price and volume suggests that short sellers are buying
shares to cover their positions, commonly referred to as a short squeeze.
The only holders with large blocks of stock to sell are insiders. But Atkins
denied any GeneMax insiders were selling, loaning or shorting their shares.

"It's the shorts," Atkins said. "They are now at the point that they have to
keep going." Atkins termed such trading "manipulation."

Whatever the case, people associated with ICI have in the past had problems
with securities regulators.

Some background: according to Washington state records, Marcus Johnson is
the executive officer of ICI. Johnson is also listed as the contact on
recent GeneMax press releases. Securities filings list Atkins as a
consultant with ICI. Others associated with the management consulting
company include Gino Cicci and Brent Pierce, who is identified in securities
filings as ICI's president and sole shareholder.

Cicci and Pierce have both had run-ins with securities regulators in British
Columbia, Canada.

In 1995, the B.C. Securities Commission banned Cicci from serving as an
officer or director of a public company for three years in connection with
promotion of a company called DNI Holdings Inc. in Canada.

In 1993, the commission prohibited Pierce from serving as an officer or
director for 15 years. The ruling also stipulated that Pierce cannot serve
as an officer or director of a company "that provides management and
administration, promotion or consulting services to a reporting issuer for a
period of 15 years."

The commission handed down the decision in connection with Pierce's
directing funds to his personal use from a public offering of shares in
Bu-Max Gold Corp. of Canada.

Atkins said Johnson is the executive officer of ICI and that both Cicci and
Pierce are connected with ICI. "I think they consult to the company."

Common History

GeneMax Pharmaceuticals Inc. was founded in July 1999 as a Delaware
corporation with a wholly owned research subsidiary in British Columbia. The
company licensed a cancer-fighting compound from the University of B.C. and
received a U.S. patent on the compound in April 2002. News of that patent
carried the shares to $10 in early May from 25 cents where they began the
year.

Then several changes took place.

On May 9, a Nevada company named Eduverse.com changed its name to GeneMax
Corp. and announced it was acquiring GeneMax Pharmaceuticals Inc. in a
"share exchange agreement."

Atkins was president of Eduverse.com, which was in the educational software
business until 2001 when it sold all its assets for about $50,000 and
settled $768,000 in other debts by issuing stock. After more reorganization
and a reverse stock split ICI had ownership of 40% of the company, with the
balance held by two individuals and a private company, all of B.C.

As part of the acquisition, the new GeneMax investors and ICI agreed to
"advance" $700,000 to the company. It delivered the first $250,000 on July
18 three days after the acquisition closed.

Most important, the new and old shareholders in GeneMax struck an agreement
that restricted trading on 9.16 million shares, or 95% of GeneMax's 9.5
million shares. The agreement releases 10% of the shares in July 2003, and
an additional 10% every three months thereafter.

But that lockup didn't include options in the hands of ICI and other former
Eduverse investors.

On April 5, before its reorganization into GeneMax Corp., the directors of
Eduverse granted 1 million options to ICI exercisable at 50 cents a share
anytime between the date of issue and April 2004. Then on May 9, the same
day the company reorganized into GeneMax Corp., directors of Eduverse
expanded the program to include additional 900,000 options to be offered to
"key personnel" at a price to be set at the time the options were issued.

So far, those options have not been granted to anyone, Atkins said.

Short sellers borrow shares and sell them on the hope of repurchasing the
shares at a lower price in the future and pocketing the difference. Selling
shares short without first borrowing the stock, or naked short selling, is a
riskier practice. While the practice is permitted in the U.S. and Canada,
recent legal challenges cast doubt on the fairness of brokerages that permit
clients to sell millions of shares short, which floods the market with
shares and drives the price down.

GeneMax has attempted to halt short selling in a couple of ways.

On July 30, GeneMax announced that it had amended its by-laws so that it
would recognize transactions backed by paper stock certificates only. Such
"certificate only" or "custody only" transactions flush the naked shorts out
of the market because owners of those shares are unable to produce
certificates.

Last month GeneMax went a step further and sued two Canadian brokers, Global
Securities Corp. and Union Securities Corp., both of Vancouver, B.C. The
action appears to be working.

Pacific International Corp. said last week that it's not permitting any
short position in GeneMax stock because of the risk of litigation. Octagon
Capital Corp. and Wolverton Securities Ltd., two other Vancouver brokerages
widely used by short sellers, have also reportedly halted shorting GeneMax
shares.

Thursday, GeneMax widened its legal fight with the brokers to U.S. courts
with a suit against 11 U.S. brokerage firms. Filed in U.S. District Court in
Nevada, the suit alleges the brokerage firms engaged in fraud and
racketeering. The suit names Knight Trading Group Inc. (NITE), Charles
Schwab Corp. (SCH) and nine others and seeks injunctions to prevent the
firms from shorting GeneMax shares and unspecified damages.

A spokeswoman for Charles Schwab said the company hadn't seen the suit yet.
A Knight spokeswoman had no comment.

Both the U.S. and Canadian suits attack the back office by claiming that
brokerages fail to properly close short sales by completing the borrowing
transaction, which results in an illegal secondary offering of shares, the
suits claim.

Art Smolensky, chairman of Global Securities, said GeneMax's attempt to
impose certificate-only trading has "scarred off" some investors concerned
that the change may soon make the shares illiquid. Now the suits against
brokerages are dampening short selling, too, said Smolensky, whose firm
continues to short the shares for clients. The result is the share price is
moving up, but not because of the fundamentals of the business.

"My hat is off to them," said Smolensky. "This is a novel approach."

With the stock now trading at more than $8, the company has a market

cap of nearly $80 million for what amounts to one unproven cancer

compound, Smolensky added.

-By Steven Jones and Carol Remond; Dow Jones Newswires;

steve-d.jones@wsj.com; carol.remond@dowjones.com



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (80783)10/7/2002 6:40:05 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Afrayem, here is a interesting story which mentions "Lines Overseas Management" which as you well know that James Dale Davidson is also (of GMXX fame) is also involved in.

CHEERS CHUMP!!

"James Dale Davidson (Co-editor of Strategic Investment newsletter, shareholder in Lines Overseas Management)"

216.239.51.100

---------------------------------------
As published in Offshore Alert on February 26, 1999.
Mezzanine Capital linked to manipulation of penny stocks

A Bermuda Stock Exchange-listed company whose minority shareholders include subsidiaries of the Bank of Bermuda and financial services firm Lines Overseas Management is caught up in what appears to be a scheme to defraud investors on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market, we can disclose.

We have uncovered an astonishing list of proven abuses and allegations of fraud and dishonesty against individuals and companies associated with Bermuda-registered investment holding company Mezzanine Capital Ltd., including its Chairman and President, Eric Chess Bronk, although we have found nothing to incriminate LOM or the Bank of Bermuda.

Bronk, some of Mezzanine's other shareholders and firms closely-linked with Mezzanine have been accused of using a variety of methods to ramp up stock prices to artificially high values so insiders can rake in profits.

These include entering into apparently bogus business deals, setting up sham firms and sending out false and misleading press releases about the prospects of companies.

Apart from allegations of share ramping, one of the companies linked with Mezzanine, Atlanta-based franchise firm Uniforms for America, has been accused by several US franchise holders of defrauding them by taking their $25,000 franchise fee and then offering no support.

One of the most damning allegations uncovered in our investigation involves a company whose stock is traded by Mezzanine, California-based XtraNet Systems, whose management includes Bronk and fellow Mezzanine Capital director Gary Davies.

An officer of XtraNet has been accused of physically stealing the financial statements of a Nevis-based Internet credit card processing company called DataBank International from its fax machine last month and then releasing them as XtraNet's a few days later, sending its stock price and trading volume soaring.

Shortly after releasing the allegedly stolen results over the Internet, XtraNet's stock went from about 16 cents per share to nearly $4 over a two week period before slipping back again to about $1.50. Trading volume, which had been almost non-existent, shot up considerably, with the biggest dump off occurring on February 1, when 1.8 million shares were sold.

Incredibly, XtraNet is currently featured as the 'Stock of the Month' for February by a promoter operating from www.hotstocknews.com, whose glowing review of XtraNet - for which it admits it was paid in shares - was largely based on XtraNet’s allegedly bogus financials.

XtraNet had indeed been negotiating to merge with the Nevis company and put out several press releases last summer announcing the deal.

However, after the deal was effectively called off in August, 1998 because the Nevis company's principal became suspicious of Bronk, XtraNet never announced the deal was off and, instead, put out a misleading press release creating the impression that it had gone through smoothly. To this day, Mezzanine's web-site at www.mezz.com still contains press releases that create the impression the deal went through.

Mezzanine Capital is a closed-end investment fund that was listed on the Bermuda Stock Exchange in the first quarter of 1995 before the current BSX regulations were in place. Its bankers are the Bank of Bermuda in Bermuda and its legal advisors are Conyers, Dill & Pearman.

The company was introduced to Bermuda by CD&P, which also represented another BSX-listed company, NimsTec, that was delisted in 1997 after we exposed its misleading and inaccurate share prospectus.

Indeed, Graham Collis, a senior partner of CD&P, helped prepare the share prospectuses for both NimsTec and Mezzanine Capital.

Although registered in Bermuda, Mezzanine is run by a group of businessmen operating out of California and Arizona and has 112 different shareholders from several countries, including the United States, Canada, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, the Turks & Caicos Islands, Panama, Ireland, South Africa and Israel.

The company's President and Chairman is Eric Chess Bronk, of Irvine, California. Other directors are Joseph R. Glenn (Vice President), of Phoenix, Arizona; Mitchell A. Saltz, Gary Davies and Sloan B. Jones, all of Scottsdale, Arizona; Carl T. Suter, of Anaheim, California; CD&P subsidiary Codan Services Ltd. (Resident Representative) and Bermuda-based CD&P attorney Wayne Morgan (Assistant Secretary).

Mezzanine's shares have never traded on the BSX. The company posts a net asset value each week that can be determined solely on the whim of its directors, according to the company's share prospectus. It appears that this NAV has deviated little from its original $10 per share, even though the stock in which it invests fluctuates wildly.

Mezzanine essentially sells its stock to a handful of microcap companies traded on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market so that it shows up as assets on these companies' books and enhances solvency. In return, Mezzanine usually receives stock in these companies, which it then trades in the marketplace, or pays cash for Regulation ‘S’ securities.

Although the Bermuda firm of Arthur Morris & Co. appears as Mezzanine's accountants on its prospectus, the company's accounts are done by Utah-based Schvaneveldt & Co., whose boss declined to comment for this story, as did all of the parties being investigated.

Mezzanine's financial statements sometimes contain remarkable items. For example, a Note to Mezzanine's fiscal 1997 financials stated: "In the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to acquire German Bearer Bonds that they valued at $10,099,306. In the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996, it was discovered that there was no established quantifiable redemption value for the Bonds. The Company responded to this discovery by taking a temporary write down of $10,099,206. The Bearer Bonds are listed as an asset of $100. The Company is seeking a private placement to sell the Bonds."

Since Mezzanine never pays dividends to its shareholders and its shareholders are not entitled to redeem their shares, according to its prospectus, its very existence seems to be to provide 'assets' to highly dubious companies, some of which have close links to Mezzanine's officers and shareholders.

Mezzanine's officers appear to manage companies whose shares are traded by Mezzanine and some of Mezzanine's shareholders also receive commissions and fees through entering into seemingly dubious business transactions, some of which are currently being litigated following disputes alleging fraud.

Mezzanine has or has had positions in the following US-based companies: XtraNet Systems, The Hartcourt Companies, Uniforms for America, Conectisys Corp., Phone Time Resources (now Global Access Pagers), Beverage Store Inc. (now Fortune Oil & Gas), Net Voice Technologies, Paystar Communications and Hycroft Environmental Corporation (of which we can find no trace). The stock of all but the one we could not locatefluctuates between a few cents and a few dollars, while each firm continually loses money.

All of the companies have an appalling track record.

Conectisys Corp. was found guilty by the SEC five months ago of participating in a stock manipulation scheme, although neither Mezzanine nor any of its known associates were parties to the action.

On September 22, 1998, Conectisys Corp. was ordered by the US District Court for the Central District Court of California to "disgorge $175,000 of proceeds derived from its fraudulent conduct", according to an SEC press release.

In related judgments against Andrew S. Pitt, Devon Investment Advisors Inc., Mike Zaman, B&M Capital Corp. and Smith Benton & Hughes, the defendants were ordered to disgorge a total of $1.06 million they had made from manipulating Conectisys stock.

"Based on the evidence presented at the trial, the court found that Pitt and Zaman together planned the manipulation of Conectisys stock and Zaman and Smith Benton carried out that manipulation with Pitt's assistance," stated an SEC press release.

"In the course of carrying out the manipulation, Zaman and Smith Benton controlled the number of Conectisys common shares available for sale on the market, dictated the prices at which those shares traded, engaged in 'daisy chain' trading with market participants to fill retail customer orders and artificially increased the price of the stock purchased by retail customers.

"The court also found that Pitt and Conectisys offered and sold restricted stock to private investors based on material misrepresentations and that Pitt and Conectisys drafted a false and misleading business plan that was supplied to potential investors.

"Finally, the court found that Pitt, Conectisys and Devon sold unregistered securities in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act."

Conectisys, which has Mezzanine shareholder Mandarin Overseas Investment Company as a holder of more than five per cent of its stock, reported a net loss of $2.7 million for fiscal 1997.

Accounting firm BDO Seidman, which took over the audit of Conectisys in 1996 after the company dismissed its previous auditors over "disagreements", said net deficiencies in the company's working capital of $1.24 million and $780,357 at November 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively, raised "substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern".

Despite the 1997 loss, the annual salary of its President, Robert Spigno, was increased to $160,000, while his wife, Patricia, received $80,000. All three senior officers, including the Spignos, also received a 'Staying Bonus' equivalent to 50 per cent of their annual salary, payable in restricted common stock, and each had options to buy 500,000 shares at "50 per cent of the average market value in the 30 days prior to it happening", according to documents filed with the SEC.

Another company closely-linked with Mezzanine, called The Hartcourt Companies, also featured on the periphery of a current investigation by the SEC into alleged stock manipulation by stock promoter Investor's Edge, although Hartcourt has not been officially implicated.

Investor's Edge has been accused by the SEC of being paid to write glowing reviews of stock that were presented to investors as impartial recommendations.

Investor's Edge recommended Hartcourt as a "strong buy" when its stock was at $1.40 but it has plummeted to 32 cents. Hartcourt's President Alan Viet Phan, who was interviewed as part of the Investor's Edge promotion, claims the promoter asked him for money but he refused to pay.

The Hartcourt Companies started an Investor's Bulletin Board for its stock last month but it was quickly taken down after a flood of negative messages from investors, some of whom claimed they had been ripped off.

Hartcourt's President Alan Phan, whose name has appeared as a director of another Mezzanine-related company called Uniforms for America, told us the bulletin board was taken down not because of the negative postings but because "someone planted a virus" and he said it would be back up again soon.

Despite the company's history of losses, Phan declared to investors that some of America's greatest companies were criticized by investors in their early days and he even likened himself to Microsoft's Bill Gates.

Hartcourt is currently suing two of Mezzanine's shareholders, Turks & Caicos Islands-registered Promed International and Mandarin Overseas Investment Company Ltd., claiming Hartcourt was defrauded in a deal to sell it 34 Alaskan gold-mines.

Hartcourt, which paid an up-front fee comprising 1.3 million Regulation 'S' Securities for the mines, reversed the deal when the defendants allegedly failed to provide a geological evaluation showing the mines were worth at least $10 million, as promised.

Hartcourt, which reported a loss of $1.6 million in 1996 and a loss of $474,372 for 1997 - $135,000 of which was due to the company issuing preferred stock dividends - now wants its shares back from Mandarin and Promed.

In another case, Eric Bronk and one of Mezzanine's other shareholders, Pagestar Inc., which appears to be operated out of Mezzanine's and Bronk's office in California, are co-defendants in a class action lawsuit filed in California on May 12, 1998 in which they are accused of stock manipulation.

Plaintiff Joseph A. Nigro claims he was conned into investing about $40,000 worth of shares in Satellite Technologies Corp. and the company it merged into, Pagestar Inc., based on false press releases about the firm's capabilities. The company's stock went as high as $3.75 based on hype but had plummeted to seven cents by September, 1997 when the alleged fraud was uncovered, states the complaint.

The statement of claim alleges that Bronk and the other individual co-defendants misled Nigro so they could "sell their own shares in the companies…and to indirectly benefit themselves by securing additional capital to pay their own salaries and bonuses as directors, employees and/or officers of the companies."

Spigno, whose attorneys are seeking between $2 million and $3 million, claims that Pagestar was nothing more than a shell company with no bona fide operations, a similar claim that has been leveled at XtraNet Systems.

There is similar discontent among investors in Uniforms for America, which sells franchises that supply medical and career uniforms.

In an investment package sent out by the company two months ago, there was a report dated August 12, 1997 by CSK Securities Research of California forecasting Uniforms for America stock price would be "in the $10 to $12 range in 1998 and in the $15 to $20 range in 1999". The reality is that, at February 25, 1999, Uniforms for America stock was trading for 56 cents.

Our research showed that CSK Securities is a business run from the home of Christina and Neal Kohlhaas, who started the company five years after being declared bankrupt in San Diego.

Uniforms for America, whose President is James D. Brockman, is facing another crisis at the moment and the possibility of a class action lawsuit from franchise holders who claim they have been defrauded.

Several of the 50 existing franchise holders in the US claim they paid up to $25,000 each for franchises but have received little or no support by the firm, as promised in contracts.

Apart from their franchise fee, some franchise holders told us they had paid Uniforms for America for merchandise but the company had failed to pay the manufacturers, who in turn eventually stopped delivering clothes to stores. One manufacturer was owed in the region of $1 million, according to one franchise holder.

It has also been claimed that Uniforms for America, which we have been told holds the leases on store properties, had failed to pay the rent to some landlords even though franchise holders had paid the rent to Uniforms for America, leading to problems for some franchise holders.

Additionally, it was claimed that Uniforms for America has tried to force some of the more successful franchise holders out of business so the corporation could take over their stores.

James Brockman failed to return a message from this newsletter.

Interestingly, Uniforms for America also holds stock in the Hartcourt Companies and Phone Time Resources, two of the half dozen or so companies Mezzanine has links with. Additionally, Hartcourt's President, Alan Phan, was listed as a director of Uniforms for America last year, although he denied to us he had been a director.

Further evidence that there might be a widespread conspiracy to defraud investors is provided by the fact that Regis Possino, a disbarred California attorney who runs Phone Time Resources, has also been involved with Hartcourt, as its corporate counsel (AFTER he was disbarred) and as an 'investment advisor' and is also a behind the scenes figure at Uniforms for America.

Possino's name appears in so many businesses linked with Mezzanine that it raises the question of whether he might be a hidden shareholder in the company.

Apart from disbarment in 1984, Possino's history includes being imprisoned for one year in 1978 for trying to sell $38,500 worth of marijuana to undercover Los Angeles cops, trying to place a monthly order for $680,000 worth of cocaine with the same officers, attempting to sell $5 million of stolen US treasury bills or bearer bonds to an undercover treasury agent, undergoing a $12 million personal bankruptcy and interfering with a witness at his trial on the marijuana offence, leading to her dismissal from the jury and his imprisonment for the rest of his trial.

"One evening during the trial, petitioner encountered one of the trial jurors as she was waiting for a table at a restaurant," reads the official record of his appeal against disbarment.

"He approached her, initiated a conversation and bought drinks for her and her companions. Although they did not discuss the merits of the case, petitioner asked the juror what she thought of the prosecutor. He also talked to her about himself, other persons involved in the trial and the judge. Learning that the juror was a religious person, petitioner discussed his own religious beliefs with her. The conversation ended when the juror and her friends were called to dinner."

Details of all of the above, with the exception of his bankruptcy, which was closed in 1992 with assets of $229,000 and liabilities of $12.18 million, were presented to the California Bar Association at his appeal against disbarment.

Although Possino's appeal against disbarment was thrown out, three of the eight members of the panel voted against disbarment and thought his licence should only be suspended for five years!

The involvement of so many businessmen with dubious pasts contradicts a claim by Mezzanine President Eric Bronk in the company's 1997 annual return with the Bermuda Stock Exchange that Mezzanine invests in companies with "strong management".

Bronk declined to discuss a list of questions we sent to him. "It appears clear that if you were interested in doing a fair article on Mezzanine Capital that you would not have waited until less than 48 hours before your publication to make any inquiries," he wrote by e-mail.

"Suffice to say that neither your questions nor the quality of your newsletter appear to merit serious or detailed response.

"Mezzanine Capital invests in emerging microcap public companies whose stock price can, by their very nature, be volatile. In the companies in which it invests, Mezzanine Capital takes only a minority position, usually less than ten per cent, and certainly has no input into the management or promotion of the companies". The last part of the sentence, however, is clearly false. In a document Mezzanine filed with the Bermuda Stock Exchange, Bronk and fellow Mezzanine director Gary Davies are listed as part of the 'Management' of XtraNet Systems.

Bronk is also listed as the Chief Financial Officer of XtraNet and Davies as one of its directors in official XtraNet documents and the telephone and fax numbers used for Mezzanine are not only the same as XtraNet's but also that of Net Voice Technologies, both companies Mezzanine holds or has held stock positions in.

Bronk, who is a licensed California attorney, has a colorful past. In 1991, he paid $1.1 million to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to settle an investigation into his role in a failed savings and loan institution in which regulators suspected fraud and embezzlement.

Additionally, Bronk and two of his companies were ordered to hand over an unspecified sum of money that was in a bank account in Los Angeles. Despite the settlement, Bronk denied any wrongdoing.

Our research shows that he has been a defendant in nine lawsuits filed at California State Court and there have been four judgments against him. Several of the cases involve allegations of dishonesty.

We have handed over details of our research to the SEC.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (80783)10/9/2002 9:53:45 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
GMXX PROMOTER. HEYSEC!!->"This stock could turn $5,000 into $750,000 or more..." -- James Dale Davidson agora-inc.com

YOU WILL PAY DEARLY FOR THIS ONE wINEHOUSE!!



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (80783)10/12/2002 1:45:38 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
AFRAYEM, THE BOYS AT GENEMAX (GMXX)SEEM PURE AS THE DRIVEN SNOW, BUT I'VE GOT SOAP AND YOU NEED A BATH. WHY LOOK. THERE IS GRANT ATKINS, MARCUS JOHNSON AND GORDON BRENT PIERCE FROM GENEMAX CREATING SHAREHOLDER VALUE FOR INVESTORS IN ULTRA PURE WATER SYSTEMS.

Ultra Pure Water Systems (Canada) Inc - Street Wire
Bad accounts nail broker
Ultra Pure Water Systems (Canada) Inc UPW
Shares issued 9,550,000 Mar 14 1995 close $ 1.20
Friday April 21 1995 Street Wire
LAWSUIT OF MERIT

by Brent Mudry

A revealing lawsuit may wash away any lingering illusions over the affairs of Ultra Pure Water Systems. Merit Investments claims the promotion was a well-orchestrated manipulation from the start. A suit filed Wednesday in the BC Supreme Court confirms street rumours the brokerage took a million-dollar hit on the deal. Merit is suing Stephen Taub, a broker still working in its Toronto head office, for $960,000. The firm claims lesser amounts from Ultra-Pure's alleged co-conspirators. If Merit was slow to uncover the scheme, it wasted little time filing the suit. The Alberta stock exchange halted the stock on March 14, and suspended trading on April 3.
Merit's suit traces an alleged wash trading scheme back to Ultra Pure's inception in 1993. The firm claims Ultra Pure president Grant Atkins and Louis Szabo, of the company's Bellingham-based associate, XXth Century Manufacturing, carried out the plan. Harvey Gorsuch was the alleged mastermind, directing several colleagues. Mr Atkins and Mr Gorsuch previously served as directors for Brent Pierce's Cost-Miser Coupons. Mr Pierce's name does not appear on any public documents for Ultra Pure.
The group launched Ultra Pure last spring after a name change of Northern Acquisition, a junior capital pool. Ultra Pure targeted the home water purification market in the US, worth a reported $1.6 billion. Mr Taub opened an account in April 1994 for International Market Trend of Vancouver, headed by Mr Gorsuch. The broker joined Merit just over two years earlier.
A string of other key players opened up Merit accounts soon after, led by XXth Century, Mr Atkins and his brother Dean. Newport Capital of Victoria and Jensen Croft Holdings, registered in The Turks and Caicos Islands in the British West Indies, followed. Both show Lloyd Rodney as the sole director, officer and employee. Jensen Croft and Mr Rodney share the same US post box in the border town of Blaine. Mr Taub also opened accounts for Ultra Pure directors Roy Hunter of Toronto and Marcus Johnson of Bellingham.
Ultra Pure paid $750,000 to Amero-Pacific Investments last May in a royalty deal. Amero-Pacific is also based in The Turks and Caicos. By this time, the stock was $1.85, up from $0.49 two months earlier. Merit claims the group created the illusion of market activity by trading stock back and forth through accounts in several other brokerage houses. Mr Gorsuch allegedly directed the scheme, trading for Grant Atkins and Mr Johnson's accounts. Mr Hunter also followed his instructions.
A third Turks and Caicos transaction triggered alarm bells at the ASE, which halted trading on March 14. Two days later, Mr Atkins reported a proposed $7 million private placement to Kanapali Investments, the third offshore entity. The ASE did not respond to the favourable news. The last trade was at $1.20, down from the stock's November high of $2.15. The exchange suspended Ultra Pure on April 3, leaving Mr Gorsuch and Mr Atkins' group with debit balances totalling $1,031,700.
ASE surveillance chief Tim Daly declined comment, citing the sensitivity of the case. "Our investigation is continuing," he notes. Over at Merit, the situation is receiving the full attention of top management. "All I've been doing is putting some papers together for various people," the firm's compliance officer, Mike Painter, explains. Merit executive v-p Jeff Olin is heading the internal investigation, in conjunction with chairman Barry Kasman.

Ultra Pure Water Systems (Canada) Inc - Street Wire
Brokers clobbered by not-so-pure promoters
Ultra Pure Water Systems (Canada) Inc UPW
Shares issued 9,550,000 Mar 14 1995 close $ 1.20
Thursday April 25 1996 Street Wire
PURE WATER -- DIRTY STOCK

by Brent Mudry

Recently released court documents reveal that Merit Investments' million dollar loss in an alleged fraud and stock manipulation scheme involving Ultra Pure Water Systems is just the tip of the iceberg. A total of seven brokerage firms were left with $2.36 million in unpaid debits when the stock was halted in the middle of its promotion last spring, according to a detailed Alberta Stock Exchange investigation. The probe confirms that controversial promoter Gordon Brent Pierce served as the alleged behind-the-scenes mastermind of the scheme, while Vancouver brokers Daniel and David Hunter played an introductory role which led to Ultra Pure's formation. In addition, the case has generated accusations, unsubstantiated to date, that brokers were given free shares in return for their roles in placing the stock with their clients. "There are allegations all over the street of broker inducements," notes a police officer investigating Ultra-Pure's affairs. One broker has already been fined $30,000 for the stock manipulation, while the Toronto Stock Exchange is currently investigating the conduct of another broker.
The commercial crime section of the RCMP recently capped a 13-month criminal investigation of the case with a coordinated series of searches of 13 brokerage firm offices in Vancouver and Toronto. The searches, aimed at seizing client and trading records concluded on April 4. The brokerages, which all cooperated with attending officers, included Merit, CM Oliver, Whalen Beliveau, Canaccord Capital, Yorkton Securities, Union Securities, Brink Hudson & Lefever, Georgia Pacific Securities, Global Securities, Pacific International Securities, Wolverton Securities and CT Securities Services. No brokers have yet been named as targets of any police investigation.
The ASE's investigation reveals that CM Oliver's Vancouver office took an $803,500 loss on unpaid debits from Ultra-Pure insiders and associates. This ranks the brokerage a close second behind Merit Investments' Toronto office, which lost $941,200. The next biggest loser was Whalen Beliveau, with a total unpaid debit of $235,400. Yorkton edged out Union for fourth place, with losses of $147,300 and $138,600 respectively. First Canada Securities and Pacific International trailed far behind, with losses of about $52,000 and $45,300 respectively. Canaccord and the other brokerages managed to emerge from the halted promotion with no losses. The criminal investigation was launched after Merit and First Canada filed complaints to the RCMP last spring, soon after the brokerages learned of their losses. CM Oliver added its own allegation of fraud three months ago. The RCMP note that Yorkton, Union and Pacific International all declined to file any criminal complaints in the matter.
The Ultra Pure saga began to unravel soon after the ASE promptly halted trading in March 1995 amid a growing wave of debits at member firms. The RCMP opened their own investigation on March 27, two weeks after the trading halt. "It will probably be quite a scandal when all this comes out," says former ASE investigator Barbara Fraser. Ms Fraser notes that Mr Pierce's involvement first came to light in a Stockwatch article in April 1995, which was based largely on a civil suit filed by Merit in the case. The civil litigation made no mention of Mr Pierce's involvement. "The individuals behind it were very much hidden. . . they just didn't show up," notes one regulator, describing Mr Pierce's well-camouflaged involvement in Ultra Pure.
The alleged fraudulent wash-trading and stock manipulation scheme traces back to Ultra Pure's inception in 1993. In its civil suit, Merit claims Ultra Pure president Grant Atkins and Louis Szabo, of the company's Bellingham-based associate, XXth Century Manufacturing, carried out the plan. Harvey Gorsuch was the alleged mastermind, directing several colleagues. Mr Atkins and Mr Gorsuch previously served as directors for Mr Pierce's Cost-Miser Coupons. Mr Pierce's name does not appear on any public documents for Ultra Pure. In a separate case, the BC Securities Commission banned Mr Pierce for 15 years from acting as a director of officer or serving in any other role for a public company. The ban became effective in June 1993, two months after the Vancouver Sun exposed Mr Pierce's involvement in Cost-Miser, which was in violation of a BCSC temporary restraining order.
According to court-filed documents, Stephen Taub, formerly of Merit, was the key broker for the Ultra Pure insiders. Mr Taub left Merit soon after the hefty debit was uncovered, and he joined Brant Securities, another Toronto brokerage firm. The RCMP first interviewed Mr Taub the day after his employer made its complaint to the police. Mr Taub was cooperative, and helped trace out his knowledge of the Ultra Pure affair. According to Mr Taub, he was introduced to Mr Gorsuch and Mr Atkins in mid-1993 by broker-brothers Dan and Dave Hunter, who then worked in Canaccord's Vancouver office. Dave Hunter left Canaccord in January and he has not yet renewed his registration with the VSE.
Mr Szabo helped trace Ultra-Pure's origin back further. The 72-year-old lifetime engineer founded XXth Century (Canada) in 1980 to develop water purification devices. Mr Szabo told police that he first met Mr Pierce in late 1990 or early 1991, and Mr Pierce offered to develop a public company for the technology. Mr Pierce told Mr Szabo that he knew Dan Hunter, who could help find a public shell in which to vend in the technology. Two years later, in the spring of 1993, Mr Pierce allegedly called Mr Szabo to tell him that Dan Hunter had found the right shell: Northern Acquisition, an ASE junior capital pool. According to Mr Szabo, as the year progressed, he met often at his office with Messrs Pierce, Atkins and Gorsuch, to develop financial and business plans.
According to the initial structure allegedly provided by Mr Pierce, the insiders would control 8.9 million of Ultra-Pure's 10.5 million outstanding shares, counting planned private placements and options, as well as earn-out and escrow shares. In this initial plan, the Hunters and their associates were the largest shareholders, with four million shares. Mr Pierce would beneficially own 2.14 million shares and Mr Szabo would own 1.92 million. Mr Atkins and Mr Gorsuch would each own 313,700 shares. Mr Szabo claims he agreed to place his shares under Mr Pierce's control for a year. (The engineer also claims no knowledge of a XXth Century USA account opened with Mr Taub at Merit. The account ostensibly bears the signature "Louis Szabo," but Mr Szabo claims he never signed any such form.)
Ultra Pure began trading on the ASE in March 1994, after a name change from Northern Acquisition. A pre-public private placement of 4.25 million units at $0.20, equal to 8.5 million shares after exercise of warrants, boosted Ultra Pure's total outstanding shares to 15.46 million. Four offshore accounts each bought 900,000 shares in this placement. Jensen Croft Holdings was registered in the Turk and Caicos Islands in the British West Indies, but it used PO Box 546 in St Helier, Channel Islands as its address. This Ryco Trust post box account has been used by participants in private placements in several other VSE promotions, including mysterious Arakis Energy shareholder Anthem International.
Ultra Pure's other offshore investors include Seacon Global Services of Ireland, Clip Foundation of Liechtenstein and Las Mariposas of Grand Cayman Island. The ASE investigation revealed that Mr Gorsuch and Mr Atkins controlled all four of these accounts. The final cornerstone of Ultra Pure's startup came in May 1994, when the company paid Amero-Pacific Investments $750,000 in a royalty deal. Mr Pierce is alleged to control Amero-Pacific, another Turks and Caicos company. By this time, the stock was $1.85, up from $0.49 two months earlier. Merit claims the group created the illusion of market activity by trading stock back and forth through accounts in various other brokerage houses. Mr Gorsuch allegedly directed the scheme, trading for Mr Atkins and numerous other accounts.
The stock hit a peak of $2.15 in November 1994, but everything began to unravel a few months later. One of the first danger signs came on January 30 1995, when a $104,000 cheque that CM Oliver deposited from Amero-Can bounced. Mr Gorsuch allegedly later sent a terse threatening note to CM Oliver broker Nolan Moss. "Brokers face several problems due to the company's trading history if an investigation is commenced," the note stated. "Brokers acceptance of UPW stock for efforts will be exposed through investigation," the message added. In addition, the note alleges assorted other irregularities by unnamed brokers in connection with Ultra Pure. Under the note's "Plan B- Proposal," the writer suggested that an "acceptable resolution" of the debit problem would save everyone from facing an investigation into the allegations.
The situation over at Merit was more serious. In early March, Mr Taub realized that he faced debits of about $700,000 in the Ultra Pure group's accounts. The brokerage received a $70,200 cheque from one account as partial payment, but the cheque was stopped. A replacement money order was received, but more stopped cheques followed. The ASE stepped in to halt trading on March 15 1995. Ironically, it was one of the last alleged brokerage "victims" who responded quickest. First Canada opened an account for numbered company controlled by Mr Gorsuch at the end of February. Soon after the halt, office manager Douglas Corrigan, facing a $52,000 debit, got on the phone. Mr Corrigan called Mr Moss at CM Oliver, who revealed he had a $600,000 debit. The First Canada manager then called Yorkton broker Mickey Magid, who said he faced a $90,000 debit. Mr Corrigan's next call was to Merit chairman Barry Kasman, who told him of the bad cheques that Merit had received. Twelve days later, Mr Corrigan and Mr Kasman called the RCMP.
Although several investigations are continuing, Mr Moss is the first individual to face any penalties from the Ultra Pure saga. The broker, who remains at CM Oliver in Vancouver, agreed on April 8 to a $30,000 fine imposed by the ASE. Mr Moss must also disgorge $3300 in commissions, face "strict" supervision for six months and refresh himself with the official handbook of rules for brokers. The broker agreed that he engaged in deceptive and manipulative trading and handled five dozen trades for Mr Gorsuch, without proper authorization.
Mr Taub, who capped his three-year career at Merit with the million dollar debit, has yet to face any disciplinary proceedings. The ASE has referred its file on the Toronto-based broker to the TSE, which is still conducting its own investigation. Mr Taub has little to say about any secret commissions that brokers may have received in the Ultra Pure deal. "No comment," the broker told a reporter Wednesday. The RCMP have not yet filed any charges in the case, but no brokers are believed to be under investigation.
The defendants in the civil suit, including Mr Taub, deny virtually all of the substantive allegations made against them, in statements of defence filed in court. Mr Gorsuch used a doctor's note to explain his inability to attend a deposition in front of Merit's lawyer last October. The doctor noted his patient had encountered problems with his memory and concentration. "He is undergoing tests to determine the cause of his symptoms," the physician added. George Angelomatis, Mr Gorsuch's lawyer, as well as Mr Pierce's, explained in an affidavit that his client had laryngitis and the flu, according to an associate of the promoter. "It is certainly one of the most interesting cases I've worked on," says an investigator.

Toronto Stock Exchange - In the News
Post says TSE acts on Ultra Pure. . . at last
Toronto Stock Exchange TSE
Wednesday January 29 1997 In the News

Also Ultra Pure Water Systems (Canada) Inc (UPW) In the News

The Financial Post reports in its Wednesday edition that stock promoter Harvey Gorsuch and insiders of Ultra Pure Water Systems cost brokerage house Merit Investment $852,000 in early 1995 after it was stuck with worthless shares in the company, according to the Toronto Stock Exchange. Reporter Dan Westell says the loss arose after broker Stephen Taub, who then worked for Merit, opened four accounts for Mr Gorsuch and associates, all of which Mr Gorsuch controlled, and three other UPW insiders. Shares bought for these accounts just before the Alberta Stock Exchange halted trading on March 14 1995 were never paid for. The TSE says that Merit has been unable to collect the money, even though it sued the participants. Mr Taub was fired on April 24 1995, because of the debits. The TSE has fined Mr Taub $50,000, charged him $10,000 toward the costs of the investigation and suspended him for a month. He now works for Brant Securities. Mr Taub violated TSE rules by not telling Merit that Gorsuch had offered him cheap warrants to sell UPW shares to clients, by not telling Merit he suspected UPW was being wash traded and by not telling Merit Gorsuch was running four apparently separate accounts. A TSE lawyer says the RCMP are investigating UPW trading.

B.C. Securities Commission - Street Wire
BCSC reveals key Stanhiser role in Vantage diversion
B.C. Securities Commission *BCSC
Tuesday September 26 2000 Street Wire

by Brent Mudry

California fraudster Gary Stanhiser succeeded in a highly suspicious asset diversion from Vantage Securities Inc. in March of 1998, a month before the troubled Vancouver brokerage was shut down by the British Columbia Securities Commission, according to commission investigation documents recently filed in court.
In a petition filed Sept. 11 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, BCSC enforcement director Sasha Angus seeks a court order compelling two small Vancouver law firms, McCullough O'Connor Irwin and Cawkell Brodie, to comply with production demands issued in February of 1999, relating to detailed records of the dubious transfer of 800,679 shares of Advanced Wing Technologies Corp. The deemed, book or original value of the shares is not known.
The BCSC fined Mr. Stanhiser, a former Seventh Day Adventist pastor who fleeced his flock, $100,000 and imposed a lifetime ban in March for his role in masterminding an unrelated offshore private placement investment scheme in which investors lost at least $11-million. The regulator also fined Vancouver brokerage Canaccord Capital a total of $428,000 and Canaccord broker John Brian Johnston a total of $102,000 for their roles in Mr. Stanhiser's Excel affair.
In court-filed documents, the BCSC reveals the Vantage asset diversion has been under formal investigation since May of 1998, the month the troubled brokerage was assigned into bankruptcy.
"Staff of the commission was contacted by counsel for Vantage, Walsh & Co., a law firm in the city of Vancouver, in or about April, 1998, with respect to Vantage's concerns that some of its assets had been wrongfully transferred into another person's name, in or about March of 1998," states Mr. Angus in the petition.
In a freeze order dated April 9, 1998, made public this month, the BCSC notes that Vantage Securities, referred to as VSI, was the registered holder of 800,679 shares of Advanced Wing.
"On or about March 10, 1998, VSI received a request from Richard Bullock, the president of 539951 B.C. Ltd., to provide the shares to Dr. Paul Boyington (a.k.a. Dr. Paul Boynton) and Dr. Harvey Pheifel as security for a loan made by Boynton and Phiefel to 539951," states the freeze order, signed by BCSC chairman Doug Hyndman.
(Mr. Bullock has served stints as directors with various companies listed on the Vancouver Stock Exchange, and stepped in as a director of Ultra Pure Water Systems (Canada) Inc. in May of 1995, two months after the Alberta Stock Exchange halted trading in shares of the controversial promotion of Gordon Brent Pierce and referred the case to the RCMP for a 13-month criminal investigation. Mr. Bullock was not a target in the criminal or regulatory probes of Ultra Pure.)
In the Vantage freeze order, the BCSC notes that Vantage officials advised investigators that the brokerage had not given any security in response to the March 10, 1998, request by Mr. Bullock, and the brokerage's directors did not authorize the transaction.
Mr. Stanhiser stepped forward a week later. "On March 17, 1998, Ron Shimoda, the president of VSI, was approached by Gary Stanhiser and Kim Lieske, the vice-president of business development of VSI, to effect the transfer of the shares," states Mr. Hyndman.
The freeze order notes that while Mr. Shimoda declined to authorize the transfer until he received some advice on the transaction, the transfer mysteriously went through.
"On April 7, 1998, staff of the commission received advice from counsel for VSI that on or about March 17, 1998, the shares were transferred by AWTC (Advanced Wing) into Boynton's name on the basis of an assurance being given by Lieske that Shimoda would authorize the transfer. The authorization was never given by Shimoda," states Mr. Hyndman.
"The shares were delivered by VSI to the law offices of Getz Karby, legal counsel to Richard Bullock, with instructions that Bullock and Stanhiser have authority over the shares," states the commission. In the April 9, 1998, freeze order, the BCSC ordered that Getz Karby hold the shares, including any shares in the process of transfer by a transfer agent or otherwise.
In a subsequent investigation order dated May 28, 1998, Mr. Hyndman appointed BCSC investigators David Zwarich, George Coleman and Gerry Halischuk to handle a broad probe into Vantage's affairs. "The staff of the commission are concerned that assets of VSI may have been wrongfully transferred," states Mr. Hyndman in the order, which appointed the trio to investigate any transaction involving the assets of Vantage dating back to June 1, 1997.
After McCullough O'Connor Irwin and Cawkell Brodie declined to comply with formal production demands made by Mr. Zwarich in February of 1999, the BCSC headed to court two weeks ago in a bid for a court order.
The Feb. 16, 1999, demand to lawyer Douglas Irwin of McCullough O'Connor Irwin seeks copies of all correspondence, instructions, notes, memoranda or other records relating to the sale or transfer of shares of Advanced Wing by, or on behalf of, Vantage Securities from Jan. 1, 1998, to April 30, 1998.
The Feb. 15, 1999, demand to lawyer Ken Cawkell of Cawkell Brodie seeks copies of all directors' resolutions passed by the board of Vantage Corporate Group Inc. or Vantage Securities from Jan. 1, 1998, to April 30, 1998, and copies of all meeting minutes for all board meetings of the two Vantage companies in the same period. The demand also seeks copies of all directors' resolutions drafted by Cawkell Brodie for Vantage Corporate or Vantage Securities in the same period.
Both law firms have asserted solicitor-client privilege on behalf of the Vantage companies as their reasons for not complying with the production demands.
(Readers wishing more details of the Stanhiser case may refer to a Street Wire dated Sept. 20.)