Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (28734)	10/5/2002 10:08:25 PM
From: Sawdusty	Respond to of 34075

It looks like someone benefited from the low share price even more than I thought. Most people would secretly be saying "hee, hee"..........., but only in secret,............yuh think?

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (28734)	10/5/2002 10:10:56 PM
From: ge-believer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

So, was Digr lying again, when he claimed to have driven away investors? That DOES affect the share price, doesn't it, Jim? Something about supply and demand....

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (28734)	10/5/2002 10:11:31 PM
From: Sawdusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Say Jim, how about adding them up, too big a chore for me right now, close to beddy bye time in the east. LOL!

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (28734)	10/6/2002 2:09:55 AM
From: Cytotekk	Respond to of 34075

Thanks Jim, very enlightening. .03 seems to be a price GE liked to sell at.......... .29 or .30 is a 10X....A huge profit by anyone's standards. Ge has done what they thought they should do to get to production. We are there now.......I find all of this quite amusing...I have free shares, I can afford to be amused. Digr banished, GE digging in the Dirt, lots of sellers at .29. Very amusing.....I am keeping notes. ;-) Sir James, you will like how I portray you in my book. C inO