Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (49863)	10/6/2002 9:27:59 PM
From: Mr. Forthright	Respond to of 281500

<<Invading Iraq and taking out Saddam WILL NOT increase security for Americans or protect us from Al Qaeda...>> Sorry to ask, but who ever said the Iraq thing was about Al-Queda?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (49863)	10/6/2002 9:28:52 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 281500

Former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft feels that by attacking Iraq we'll be 'stirring up a hornets nest in The Middle East' Ah yes, Brent Scowcroft, one of the geniuses who is responsible for our decision to leave Saddam in place in 1991 and 'contain' him. His advice has the side-effect of justifying his own decisions, did you notice? Did you read the interview in Ha'aretz?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (49863)	10/7/2002 12:03:33 AM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Congressman McDermott (whom dissemblers try to discredit) says about his visit to Iraq :"he discovered that taking out Saddam isn’t the answer because, in his opinion, an assassination or bombing of Baghdad would merely open the door for Arab retaliation against America. (but there are, of course, those who wish to eliminate all Arabs) Congressman “Baghdad Jim” McDermott Joins The Bob Rivers Show! new.twistedtunes.com Washington State Congressman Jim McDermott told us that detractors started calling him “Baghdad Jim” because they ran out of things to say. McDermott said he was mislabeled simply because he happened to be in Iraq when he made his anti-war comments. McDermott said he went to Baghdad to prevent war. He warned Iraqi officials not to mess with America. He cautioned Iraq not to say anything that could be misconstrued as threatening. McDermott went out of his way to NOT meet with Saddam… even though he could have! The last thing he wanted was a photo of him shaking hands with Saddam. Instead, he met with Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz and 25 other officials. Joe asked McDermott what he said to the Iraqis when the TV cameras were off. Did he warn them that Bush was a crazy Texan who loves guns? “I wouldn’t have said it quite that way,” replied McDermott. Congressman McDermott last visited Iraq in 1991 and wanted to see the impact of 11 years of sanctions. He said he discovered that taking out Saddam isn’t the answer because, in his opinion, an assassination or bombing of Baghdad would merely open the door for Arab retaliation against America. Not only that, McDermott told us he’s afraid that killing Saddam would set a precedent for other countries to eliminate undesirable leaders or political situations. He cited China taking over Taiwan or Indian nuking Pakistan as possible examples. McDermott informed us that the city of Baghdad is the size of Detroit, which means that war there would involve nasty street fighting. Imagine anybody trying to take over Detroit! Congressman McDermott also told us that he doesn’t know why Senators Murray and Cantwell have been silent on the subject of war with Iraq. But he thinks the issue of whether to go to war is one of the most important votes Congress will face. “Baghdad Jim” said he doesn’t want the United States acting alone as world policeman on the Iraq situation. But McDermott made it clear that he is not a pacifist. He told us “sometimes war is necessary.”