Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (61320)	10/7/2002 7:11:57 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

If we go on consequences, then everyone poses a global threat. If Lichtenstein allows a terrorist to pass through their borders, when they should have caught them, and that terrorist blows up some target and starts WWIII then one could make an argument that Lichtenstein caused WWIII. I do not want to go with flowing consequences as a justification for invading other countries. I choose to use the calculus I already articulated (Did they invade another country? Was that other country the US, or a country that asked the US for assistance?).