To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (306939 ) 10/10/2002 5:16:07 PM From: DuckTapeSunroof Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670 Tommie... <LOL!>... seriously now... <HaHaHaHaHa!!!!!>, ah, you're breaking me up! I can hardly stand it! I never HEARD anything so STUPID! Ah, YOU'RE KILLING ME! Please don't make me laugh anymore! You ACTUALLY said the following things... things a DOG couldn't be convinced to believe: "buddy, stick with having conversations with stupidity found." >>> Ha! That's EXACTLY WHAT I'M DOING! Having a conversation with YOU, stupid! And I've sure 'found stupidity' <G> in your posts.... "Buddy how or what I want any vote counted as makes no difference. PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH got more votes than the loser. A 100% legal and correct statement." >>> "Legal and correct" to a dog who can't read, maybe! >>> Go ahead: SHOW ME THE VOTE COUNT STUPID! (You do understand the word 'count' don't you? I know it's a lot to epect from you but, really, how could anyone go through life without understanding what 'counting' means?) "And enjoy knowing President Bush won the population vote by a massive 16 million. A 100% legal and correct statement." >>> Lie. Habitual Liar Thomas A. Watson. "Those who cannot read rush in and make fools of themselves and when the see they are fools the habitual liars among them rant, misquote and flat out lie." >>> That's you to a "T", habitual liar Thomas A. Watson. "Gee buddy, how my posts I did attempt to patiently get you to focus on the truth and you blindly said it was wrong all because you could not read and comprehend what you read." >>> Oh, I read it, alright! You were claiming the right to vote for 'dirt clods'... square footage of ground... somehow turning crime statistics into inaginary votes... next you'll be squeezing silicon breast implants and reading chicken entrails to 'decide' the will of the population... but poor Tommie: what's wrong with good old fashioned VOTING to decide elections? "Was neocon ever fooled???" >>> Nah, he's the one who reminded me that the Web site you posted for your 'voting evidence' WAS AN ELABORATE JOKE... ONLY YOU DIDN'T GET IT! --------------------------------------------------------------- <G> Actually Tommie, I'm begining to think you'd actually like your millions of imaginary votes to be counted in the 'dirt clod' category. I can see you out in some withered corn field... picking up one clod of dirt after another saying: "Another vote for Dubya!" "Here's another one... and another!" "Why, we're going to win by a country mile if I just keep counting dirt instead of votes!"