SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SeachRE who wrote (307007)10/10/2002 12:55:58 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 769667
 
the real story on the risks of the BUSH power move to preemptive strike against another country....especially Iraq
A Virus-Fed Doomsday
'Bio-Armageddon' is a possibility if U.S. hits Hussein.

By SCOTT P. LAYNE and MICHAEL H. SOMMER, Scott P. Layne is an
associate professor of epidemiology at the UCLA School of Public
Health. Michael H. Sommer is a visiting scholar at the Institute of
Governmental Studies, UC Berkeley, and a visit

The debate among the nation's politicians and the
advice they're receiving from intelligence experts
should not focus exclusively on diplomacy versus
preemptive military action against Saddam Hussein.
Instead, there is one nightmarish outcome--the
so-called bio-Armageddon scenario--that is of
immediate concern.

It goes like this: We go in to take out Hussein, and
his obedient henchmen pull a "doomsday" switch,
releasing contagious biological agents for which
there is no vaccine and no cure. Not only are
hundreds of thousands of American troops wiped
out but, if Hussein wishes to die a martyr's death,
the virulent agents are released to spread around
the world and wipe out half of mankind.

Even mentioning this subject may seem like scaremongering, but it's not. In
today's dicey world, this horrific possibility is a biological, military and political
fact of life--or death--that cannot be dismissed out of hand.

How seriously has the bio-Armageddon scenario been weighed in councils of
war? An Oct. 7 letter from CIA Director George Tenet to Sen. Bob Graham
(D-Fla.), chairman of the Intelligence Committee, stated that a cornered
Hussein might use "his last chance to exact vengeance by taking a large number
of victims with him."

It costs about $1 million to kill one person with a nuclear weapon, about
$1,000 to kill one person with a chemical weapon and about $1 to kill one
person with a biological weapon. Low cost alone may dictate that current and
future terrorists will opt for the $1 biological killers.

Last year, a bombshell of a scientific paper, published in the Journal of
Virology, revealed that a bioengineered form of mousepox--a close cousin of
smallpox--was vaccine-resistant and 100% lethal. It showed that simply
inserting one immune-inhibiting gene into mousepox was all it took.

Is it conceivable that Hussein's well-trained scientists, who crave to please their
boss at any cost, have not read this paper and applied its findings to smallpox?

This year, another stunning paper in the research journal Science described the
complete synthesis of the poliovirus genome in the test tube. This feat of
bioengineering pointed out that deadly viruses, such as smallpox, can be
resurrected in the test tube. No seed germs are required, as previously thought,
just genetic sequences, training in molecular biology at the master's-in-science
level and a few years of laboratory work.

It's hard to underestimate or sugarcoat these scientific papers. They offer a
blueprint for creating vaccine-resistant and highly lethal viruses that could, for
example, render the current smallpox vaccine stockpile and the U.S.
government's emergency vaccination program absolutely useless. This
biological genie may pose a far greater threat than 1,000 atomic bombs.

It's no longer hypothetical to bioengineer such an agent. And less than $1
million would be required to create deadly and contagious agents.

In the wrong hands, a bioengineered virus could be bottled and used as an
insurance policy against invasion and overthrow. And, if unleashed, it could
change the very fabric of remaining modern civilization. At a minimum, too
many people might be stricken to continue to operate oil refineries, power
plants, airlines and communications.

A completely new appraisal and posture are needed to deal with these threats.

First, the U.S. needs to train and place more intelligence agents knowledgeable
in this type of warfare throughout the world, because the work taking place in a
secret offensive biological weapons program cannot be monitored from
airplanes or satellites. It must be spied on firsthand.

Building our biological human intelligence capabilities will take years. It will
require the scientific, law enforcement and national security communities to
finally work together, which they have shown little inclination to do.

Second, we need to build a high-speed/high-volume infectious disease
laboratory and information processing system that links the molecular
fingerprints of biological agents to their sources worldwide.

Such a system would provide comprehensive and rapid analyses of biological
agents and, when every moment counts, it could help to save countless lives
after an attack--both at home and abroad.

If we had such a laboratory and biological sample collection program working,
we could test for the combined signatures of pox viruses and virus-altering
proteins. If, for example, the two were found to reside in the wrong hands or
places, we could take preemptive actions.

Here's the bottom line: Bio-Armageddon and biological blackmail cannot
continue to remain as realistic options for terrorists.



To: SeachRE who wrote (307007)10/10/2002 1:02:36 PM
From: Cola Can  Respond to of 769667
 
Wake me up when you have an original thought or say
something worth reading. But then again, someone else wake
me up. If I have to depend on Searchy to have an original
thought or say something worth reading, h*ll I'll never
wake up! LOL!!