Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (62200)	10/10/2002 2:07:36 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Kant's view on sex was way beyond being merely rigid. Much in the same way a nun or priest who takes a vow of chastity feels anything not up to their standard is immoral. It was a stepping stone that skewed his entire outlook, sense of life or epistemology, whatever you want to call it. Lust [the "impetus" to sexual "pleasure"] is called unnatural if one is aroused to it not by a real object but by his imagining it, so that he himself creates one, contrary to [natural] purpose; for in this way imagination brings forth a desire contrary to nature's end. . . . Kant appeared to have quite the imagination.