SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (14275)10/11/2002 7:34:06 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 57684
 
Software Stocks That Still Shine

OCTOBER 11, 2002
INVESTING Q&A
BusinessWeek Online
businessweek.com

S&P analyst Jonathan Rudy says to look to security and game companies. He especially likes Symantec and Electronic Arts



Software stocks, like those of many other companies in the world of technology, await a revival in corporate capital spending for their own revival. But two areas of software -- Internet security and video games -- are ripe for investment now, according to Jonathan Rudy, Standard & Poor's industry analyst covering software and commercial-services stocks.

Story Continues Below Ad

Rudy gives strong buy rankings to one company in each of those niches: Symantec in security and Electronic Arts in game software. Just one level lower down, with accumulate ratings, are companies such as giant Microsoft, which Rudy sees as still a growth stock -- although he expects its growth to be in the low double-digits instead of the 20% or more of the past. Still, that is "impressive compared to the rest of its peer group," Rudy adds.

Other stocks in his coverage area drawing accumulate recommendations are Check Point Software, Oracle, PayChex, and THQ. However, Rudy notes that S&P suggests investors underweight technology in general as a portion of their portfolios and adds that "stock selection is critical in this type of environment."

These were some of the points Rudy made in an investing chat presented Oct. 8 by BusinessWeek Online and Standard & Poor's on America Online. He was responding to questions from the audience and from BW Online's Jack Dierdorff. Following are edited excerpts. A complete transcript is available from BusinessWeek Online on AOL at keyword: BW Talk.

Q: Jon, the market alternately scared and pleased us today, but it wound up ahead -- what do you at S&P see as the near-term outlook for the broad market?
A: I can't speak for the broader sector, but...as far as technology, we're still underweight. And as such, stock selection is critical in this type of environment.

Q: How have the stocks you cover -- software and commercial services -- borne up under the selling pressure?
A: It has been tough. My software group -- my coverage universe -- is down 58% year to date. And the payroll processors I cover under commercial services are down 36% year to date. So it has been very challenging.

Q: Let's go to a giant in your turf -- is Microsoft (MSFT ) still a growth stock?
A: Yes, it is. However, the days of 20% growth are over. Most likely, Microsoft will grow in the low double digits. But despite this challenging economic environment, it's still growing approximately 10%-plus, which is impressive compared to the rest of its peer group.

Q: Is Siebel Systems (SEBL ) a buy?
A: We have a hold recommendation on SEBL, which has gotten hammered lately after announcing a very disappointing second quarter. We expect the environment to continue to be difficult for Siebel. However, with the shares trading at $5.65, with over $4 per share in cash, we would still hold Siebel at this time.

Q: To follow up on Siebel's second-quarter disappointment, do you have any hopes for revived earnings in your coverage area? Or does corporate capital spending have to revive first?
A: For the enterprise-software providers, they're absolutely dependent upon corporate info-tech spending at least stabilizing, which we have not seen in this environment. Therefore, estimates continue to come down for companies like Siebel, PeopleSoft (PSFT ), Veritas (VRTS ), and Oracle (ORCL ). However, other areas such as Internet security and video-game software do not necessarily need corporate IT spending to rebound.

Q: I'm interested in your opinion on Check Point Software (CHKP ) and Citrix Systems (CTSX ).
A: I don't cover Citrix. However, we have a 3-STAR, or hold, recommendation on the shares. However, I do cover Check Point and have a 4-STAR, or accumulate, recommendation on the shares. Check Point has nearly $5 per share in cash, with no debt, and is extremely profitable, with net margins around 60%. We continue to like Check Point and believe that this leader in the firewall and VPN [virtual private networks] markets will continue to take share.

Q: You mentioned this one -- where do you see PeopleSoft (PSFT ) going? Fairly priced now?
A: We have a hold recommendation on the shares, primarily due to its strong balance sheet, with over $5 per share in cash and relatively little debt. However, near-term there will likely be pressure on the shares, as estimates will likely continue to get cut due to the challenging global economy.

Q: You referred to Oracle just a minute ago, and several people are asking what you think of ORCL now.
A: I have a 4-STAR, or accumulate, recommendation on the shares. It's another software company that has a very strong balance sheet, with over $6 billion in cash and practically no debt. It's also extremely profitable, with 30% operating margins and a return on equity of over 30%. Its database business is very solid. However, our primary concerns with the company are its weak applications business and continuing concerns over Larry Ellison's management style. But despite that, we believe the shares are still attractive.

Q: SAP (SAP ) has really been hit! Are things worse than usual for that company?
A: I don't cover SAP analytically. However, from a competitive perspective, it has been an extremely difficult environment for the enterprise-software companies. And the latest shoe to drop has been in Europe, which affects SAP significantly more than companies like Siebel and PeopleSoft.

Q: Do you think Sapient (SAPE ) can make it back up to $10?
A: I don't cover Sapient. However, it was recently dropped from our coverage universe due to low price levels. I would have to say the odds are against Sapient ever getting back to $10. Once a stock hits the $1 level, not many companies make it back.

Q: What about ITWO (i2 Technologies)?
A: I did cover i2 Technologies and recently had to drop them from coverage due to shares trading below $1. We had carried an avoid recommendation at the time.

Q: Understandably, you have a lot of stocks ranked hold, and you've mentioned one or two accumulates. Are there any buys in your coverage now?
A: Sure. Our two top-rated stocks are Symantec (SYMC ) and Electronic Arts (ERTS ). Symantec is a leader in Internet-security software and continues to do very well in its consumer antivirus business, as it makes progress in the enterprise-security market. It trades at a reasonable valuation with a p-e-to-growth rate of around 1.1 times, which is very reasonable in the software universe.

Electronic Arts (ERTS ) is the leader in video-game software and has the strongest and most diverse brands of any company in that field. We continue to like both of these companies very much and have price targets in the upper 30s for Symantec and mid-70s for Electronic Arts.

Q: What about ISSX (Internet Security Systems)?
A: I recently initiated coverage on ISSX with a hold recommendation. They are the leader in intrusion-detection software. However, our primary concern at this point is valuation and their dependence on the enterprise market.

Q: Why the hold recommendation? Isn't security software at its highest demand now?
A: It depends on the type of security software, such as antivirus, intrusion detection, or firewall security. Our primary concern with ISSX is its valuation.

Q: What about the prospects for PMTC (Parametric Technology)?
A: I have a hold recommendation on Parametric with the shares trading near cash with no debt. We would still hold Parametric. However, near-term prospects remain challenging.

Q: What is your take on RATL (Rational Software)?
A: We have an avoid recommendation on the shares. Despite trading below cash levels, this is another software company that has a higher debt-to-equity ratio than its peer group. Also, there are management concerns, which would lead us to avoid the shares at this time.

Q: What about BEAS (BEA Systems)?
A: I have a hold recommendation on the shares. BEA remains a leader in the application-server space. However, IBM (IBM ) has proven to be a formidable competitor for BEA, and we would hold shares at this time.

Q: How about VRTS (Veritas)? It seems to have been beaten down unnecessarily.
A: I have a hold recommendation on the shares, primarily due to their premium valuation, but also due to their vulnerability to estimate cuts in this environment. We think Veritas has a very bright future and a very strong balance sheet, with nearly $4 a share in cash and almost no debt. However, with recent management turmoil, such as the CFO leaving under difficult circumstances, we would not add to positions at this time.

Q: Can you refresh us on the stocks you give 4-STARS to? Accumulates?
A: Sure. Check Point Software (CHKP ), Oracle (ORCL ), Microsoft (MSFT ), THQ (THQI ), and PayChex (PAYX ). Basically, the common theme with these companies is strong balance sheets, strong cash flow from operations, solid profitability, and market leadership -- all of which are important characteristics in this difficult environment.

Q: What about ADSK (AutoDesk)?
A: I have a hold recommendation on the shares. Despite their reasonable valuation, I have been disappointed with recent management execution and would not add to positions at these levels.

Q: How do you and S&P select software companies for coverage? Do sales and market caps, for example, play a role?
A: Absolutely. Those are two of the criteria. Additional criteria include whether or not it's an index company, stock-price levels (i.e., over $5 a share), and a float balance.

Q: Judging from all the questions here today, there's still a lot of interest (online anyway) about tech stocks and, in this case, software. Do you think it's justified, Jon?
A: Absolutely. In regard to software, it's important to focus on the leading companies with strong balance sheets, cash flow, and earnings. Companies that have those qualities should survive and emerge from this downturn stronger than ever. For example, Microsoft is increasing its R&D budget by approximately 20% this fiscal year, to over $5.2 billion, which is larger than the revenues of the majority of the software companies in my universe. It can continue to innovate while others have to retrench, which will be a distinct competitive advantage going forward.

Q: The question is, what you should buy now? And what should existing investors hang on to?
A: Just to reiterate, I have 4-STAR or accumulate ratings on Check Point Software, Oracle, Microsoft, THQ, and PayChex. And I have strong buys on Symantec and Electronic Arts.

Edited by Jack Dierdorff



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (14275)10/11/2002 11:45:13 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 57684
 
Tech Professionals See Flat Spending Budgets For 2002

By Donna Fuscaldo, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

Thursday October 10, 10:30 am ET

ORLANDO, Fla. -(Dow Jones)- Market researchers predicted that information technology spending would increase this year, but information technology professionals aren't as optimistic.

Technology executives attending the Gartner Symposium ITXPO in Orlando say spending on technology gear will likely remain flat, at least for 2002. That differs with Gartner's prediction, which calls for a 3.4% increase in spending.

"There's a lot of uncertainty worldwide with the marketplace and Iraq," said Dean Zarriello, director of networking for Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

Until the uncertainty "shakes out," spending will remain unchanged, he said.

Going into 2002, many people predicted an uptick in technology spending. But that increase has gotten pushed out as confidence in corporate America and the economy has worsened.

While the chief executives of major technology companies are optimistic that things will eventually improve, some are sending signals that currently it may have gotten worse.

Cisco Systems Inc. (NasdaqNM:CSCO - News) Chief Executive John Chambers said customers are being the most cautious he's seen during the current downturn. Chambers gave a keynote presentation at the Gartner Symposium, which brought together roughly 6,000 IT professionals.

Cisco isn't alone. Last week, storage heavyweight EMC Corp. (NYSE:EMC - News) issued a third-quarter profit warning. The storage maker said business at the end of the quarter had deteriorated. Going into September, EMC had signaled it was on track to meet its targets.

In late August, Sun Microsystems Inc. (NasdaqNM:SUNW - News) , said spending may be worsening. In an interview this week, Chief Executive Scott McNealy said things haven't changed.

Risk To Industry

While Gartner is forecasting a rise in spending, albeit a modest one, the Stamford, Conn., market research company said there is still significant risk to the industry, given the uncertainty surrounding the global economic recovery.

Gartner said IT spending this year is being led by the telecommunications industry, with services and hardware following. The company, which is calling for sales of technology to reach $2.3 trillion in 2002, said in a press release early this week that it's unlikely there will be anything beyond normal seasonal spending before the second quarter of 2003.

Jerrl Evans, managing director of Harris County in Texas, thinks it will take even longer than that. He doesn't see tech spending increasing for another 18 months. Meanwhile, John Hopkins' Zarriello said IT spending will remain flat for the next two years.

Like many technology professionals, Evans said corporate profits will have to improve before spending can see a recovery. The sentiment is shared by Intel Corp.'s Chief Executive Craig Barrett and Cisco's Chambers.

Barrett, who also spoke at the Gartner conference this week, said an increase in corporate profits will translate into investment in technology, but when that happens is unclear. Over the long term, he is optimistic about the future of technology. Demand for technology won't slow down, the executive said this week. Moore's Law, which calls for the doubling of processing power every other year, will ensue for the next 15 to 20 years.

Cisco's Chambers, too, said an improvement in tech spending will be contingent on a pick-up of corporate profits. When that happens, he said, a technology recovery will follow two to six months later.

For the meantime, attendees at the Gartner Symposium said any spending that will happen this year will be on things that will give a company an immediate return on investment.

"CEO's are looking for a very quick return on investment," said Jim Roden, manager of MIS at Teledyne Brown Engineering, a unit of Teledyne Technologies Inc. (NYSE:TDY - News) in Los Angeles. If there isn't an immediate benefit, the spending won't be allocated, he said.

Companies are only spending on those things that need to be fixed, added James Thomas, of Blue Bell, Penn., Unisys Corp. (NYSE:UIS - News) . Companies are spending on things that need to get done, he said.

-By Donna Fuscaldo, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5253; donna.fuscaldo@dowjones.com



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (14275)10/11/2002 4:38:27 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57684
 
Venture Capital: High-tech meltdown could last 2 more years

By JOHN COOK
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER
Friday, October 11, 2002

The high-tech economy was supposed to be coming out of its funk by now. At least that's what many local venture capitalists predicted -- or should we say prayed for -- last year.

But recent reports and economic data indicate that the high-tech economy -- mired in a 2 1/2- year-old slump -- will probably get worse before it gets better.

Take, for example, comments made this week by Cisco Systems Chief Executive Officer John Chambers. The leader of the world's largest maker of networking equipment said executives are the most cautious he has ever seen in his business career. He went on to say that a recovery in the battered telecommunications sector may be as far off as a year and a half.

Those comments coincided with a report from Dataquest that said spending on technology products this year and next would not be as robust as originally anticipated.

That tidbit, coupled with the fact that the Nasdaq is now trading at levels not seen since 1996, doesn't paint a very nice picture for technology start-ups.

Tom Simpson, managing partner at Northwest Venture Associates in Spokane, usually doesn't pay a lot of attention to these types of economic findings. That's because by the time they come out the writing is already on the wall for his portfolio companies.

"We are already living and breathing that tech spending is down," said Simpson, whose investments include NetMotion Wireless, Sightward and VoteHere. "We see it in the monthly financial statements we get back from our companies."

He's been telling his start-ups to prepare for at least another 18 months of hard times.

"It is tough," Simpson said. "You just expect it is going to be a long, drawn-out nuclear war."

Brent Holliday, a venture capitalist with Greenstone Venture Partners, also is pessimistic about the near future.

"I don't expect 2003 to be any better than 2002 and in fact it only can be worse," Holliday said. "There are no signs of any of this turning around."

He's telling his portfolio companies to watch economic reports from such bellwethers as Cisco Systems, Intel and Microsoft in an attempt to figure out when technology spending might pick up. He's also preaching the gospel of capital conservation.

As an example, Holliday pointed to a Vancouver, B.C., photonics company that recently raised $5 million. Originally, the money was supposed to last a little more than a year. Now it must last 24 months.

"Everyone is just taking the money and stretching it," Holliday said. "What else can you do? It is just a terrible time out there."

This is not the type of rhetoric one would have imagined hearing at this time. After all, when I asked four venture capitalists 16 months ago to take a guess as to when the high-tech recession might end, all four predicted that it would have been over by now.

Now, many shell-shocked venture capitalists are preparing for two more years of heartache. Some say a wave of closures, layoffs and bankruptcies is just around the corner.

Recent statistics released by VentureOne, a San Francisco-based research company, point to trouble ahead. According to VentureOne, a whopping 5,815 companies have raised more than $106 billion in venture capital since 1999. Of those, 4,297 are still alive.

That means there are still a lot of companies existing on the fumes of their last venture capital round. When that money dries up, many more firms certainly will close down. In fact, VentureOne says the failure rate of companies financed in 1999 and 2000 will be much higher than previous years.

Venture capitalists such as Simpson and Holliday are now preparing for this coming wave.

"I am planning on it going on for a while," said Simpson, referring to the slump in technology. "Hopefully I will be pleasantly surprised. But I am planning on it and I think it is the right thing to plan for."

No wonder that two of Simpson's most recent investments have been in non-tech companies.

Holliday, whose investments include local start-ups such as eTunnels, NetUpdate and RevX, thinks many companies are stuck in a funding gap without many prospects ahead. He said the winnowing process has only begun.

"I think you are going to see the other shoe drop and finally all of these companies that are on their last legs that have been around since 2000 and early 2001 are going to be shuttered," he said. "There is going to be a whole other wave of start-up shutdowns."

Tom Huseby, managing partner at SeaPoint Ventures in Bellevue, agrees.

"There's a big shakeout that still has to happen," he said.

If that occurs, there could be a few more vacancy signs hanging on Seattle office buildings.

P-I reporter John Cook can be reached at 206-448-8075 or johncook@seattlepi.com. For more information on Seattle-area start-ups or venture capital firms, visit www.seattlepi.com/venture/

seattlepi.nwsource.com