SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: long-gone who wrote (90518)10/11/2002 7:17:33 AM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116810
 
I will give you GE and Yahoo and all the other Christmas tree lights that blink off and on, but the fundamental truth is what drove the Dow up was massive investment in the tech sector, and phony accounting. All of this was warned about and all the warning were ignored. (Levitt, SEC retiree) The fact is the Emperor Dow has no clothes and his Christmas tree is on fire.

Dow 11,000 was based on increased everything and Yahoo making 2 dollars a share, not 5 cents. Fact is companies like Yahoo will someday go tits up and so will many internet carriers. Even the cable TV companies operate at a loss mostly and they have a good economic model compared to the internet.

Once you had 1000 companies that were making their numbers and outmaking their numbers and 300 dollar tech stocks that cannot sell a computer now to save their lives. And Compaq and HP in a marriage of misery. Once Goliaths of networking, defeated by David Chow's cheapo PC.

So you have one stock with its finger in the dyke. But in fact the whole sorry mess is going to get swept away by the flood tide of a return to normalcy. And as I see it, 'Merickan bizness has not fundamentally expanded since 1987 and that is about where the Dow is headed. Everything else is money flood. And when money floods out, it will be bye-bye, Dow peak and hello Dow trough.

All we will need next year is a few urban revolutions, crop failure, massive strikes and layoffs and a couple of huge hurricanes and floods to round out the picture.

Things go peristaltically through the intestine of the economy. We have to wait for another Tech bulge before being expelled into the sewage of economic bliss.

EC<:-}



To: long-gone who wrote (90518)10/11/2002 8:01:12 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116810
 
Release: 4703-02
For Release: September 19, 2002

FLORIDA RESIDENT CHARGED WITH SWINDLING AT LEAST $10.6 MILLION FROM INVESTORS AND SPENDING MONEY ON LAS VEGAS JUNKETS, AIRPLANE CHARTERS, HOMES, AND AUTOMOBILES

CFTC Charges Donald C. O’Neill and His Companies with Fraudulent Solicitation and Misappropriation in Connection With Purported Foreign Currency Hedge Funds

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced today the filing of an enforcement action in federal court in Florida against defendants Donald C. O’Neill, of City of Lighthouse Point, Florida, and eight interrelated companies he owned, controlled, or managed. The complaint, filed on September 17, 2002, charges the defendants with fraudulent solicitation and with misappropriating at least $10.6 million solicited from investors for the purpose of trading foreign currency futures contracts. The CFTC alleges that O’Neill used the investors’ money for business, personal, and luxury expenditures.

The companies named in the complaint are: Frecom Technology, a Delaware corporation, Shelaley Holdings, LLC, a Nevada Corporation, and Momentum Trading Group, Inc., NDT Fund, LLC, Orca Funds, Inc., Orca Capital Fund A, LLC of Florida, Orca Mohave A, LLC and Orca Hopi A, LLC, all Florida corporations.

The complaint also names as relief defendants the following persons, who allegedly received investor funds: Danielle O’Neill, O’Neill’s wife; Nancy Iagrossi, O’Neill’s mother-in-law; and Robert O’Neill, O’Neill’s brother.

Federal Court Issues Order Freezing Assets of O’Neill and His Companies

On September 18, 2002, the CFTC obtained a federal court order freezing the assets of the defendants and prohibiting the destruction of documents.

The CFTC complaint alleges that, starting in January 2001 and continuing through at least July 2002, O'Neill, operating through the series of companies he owned, controlled, or managed (the Orca Common Enterprise), solicited investments totaling at least $13 million from at least 29 customers for the ostensible purpose of trading primarily foreign currency futures contracts.

According to the complaint, through those companies, some of which he referred to as a "hedge fund" or an "alternative asset management" firm, O'Neill misappropriated a minimum of $10.6 million of investor funds and used the money for personal benefit. For example, the complaint alleges that O'Neill spent at least $5.75 million of the misappropriated funds to finance an extravagant lifestyle that included a nearly $3 million home for himself and two other houses for his wife and mother-in-law in an exclusive Florida coastal community; several high-end automobiles; more than $900,000 in airplane charters; and junkets to Las Vegas over a period of 45 days that resulted in gambling losses of over $800,000. According to the complaint, defendants traded some portion of investors’ funds and sustained an overall net trading loss of around $487,000.

The complaint further alleges that O'Neill and the Orca Common Enterprise made numerous false claims when soliciting the funds and attempting to lull investors who inquired about their investments. For example, the complaint alleges that O'Neill claimed to have hundreds of millions of dollars under management, although he never did; to have substantial trading experience with a financial firm that did not exist; and to have traded investors’ funds at two brokerage firms, when those firms, in fact, were only corporate accommodation addresses that O'Neill created, and never existed as going concerns.

Among the victims of the fraud were two groups of Native American investors -- the Fort Mojave tribe and the Hopi Tribal Housing Authority. Their investments represented nearly $10 million of the total money raised in the scheme.

In its continuing litigation, the CFTC is seeking preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, an accounting, restitution to customers, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, and civil monetary penalties of $120,000 or triple the monetary gain, whichever is greater, for each violation of the Commodity Exchange Act.

The Honorable Alan Gold of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has ordered a hearing on the CFTC’s motion for preliminary injunction for September 26, 2002.

The following CFTC Division of Enforcement staff are responsible for this case: Susan Bovee, Wendy Z. Woods, Ghassan Hitti, Patricia Gomersall, and Alan Edelman.

A copy of the CFTC complaint and restraining order may be obtained at www.cftc.gov.

Media Enforcement Contact:
Susan Bovee
Associate Director
CFTC Division of Enforcement
(202) 418-5409
cftc.gov