Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (307388)	10/11/2002 10:59:09 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

Why does one have to sample, one can sum and deal with the total. I see you as putting in constraints that don't exist. All the locations with 200% or better voter tournout went 100% for mr. bill. That only happened in red areas. I believe the % turnout for Blue area was smaller by several % than the red area. That is what I recall. But if turnout % was equal then my premis is true. I love the Gore Satanic coorellation gif. mwhodges.home.att.net I have a couple of sources for the map. This site will provide you wide some of the stuff. mwhodges.home.att.net mwhodges.home.att.net mwhodges.home.att.net Turnout is about apathy and the environment. I'd suggest the the more rural an area the more difficult it is to vote and that depresses tournout. Cities from 0 to 50,000 went 60-40 for President Bush. In the 2000 presidential election of the 207 million citizens of voting age, only 105 million voted - meaning 102 million people did not make the effort to vote.