Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (19064)	10/11/2002 9:30:18 PM
From: hdl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

on cnbc wall street journal editorial board roundtable tonight- susan lee said something about a certain % of muslims being strongly opposed to muslim haters of non-muslims. did anyone hear the %? i missed it.

To: AK2004 who wrote (19064)	10/14/2002 11:10:49 AM
From: Imran	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

the saudi government, which is extreme wahabbist has imposed that rule that makkah is only open to muslims. makkah should be open to all "people of the book". let me point out that a lot of the muslim population doesnt agree with the wahabbi perspective on islam.

To: AK2004 who wrote (19064)	10/14/2002 11:16:22 AM
From: Imran	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

i hate to inform you that not all muslims support the 9/11 attacks nor the suicide bombings in israel. there are palestinians who disagree with the suicide bombings AND there are israelis who disagree with the expansion of the settlements in the west bank. israel has been ignoring UN security council resolutions for 50 years. so has india over kashmir. only after after 9/11 did the US start actively voicing for the arrest of the highest level officials who were behind the rwandan tutsi massacre and have placed rewards for information leading to capture (US$5m). why are some allowed to breach security council resolutions without recourse and others not?