To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (307635 ) 10/13/2002 5:40:47 PM From: DuckTapeSunroof Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670 Re: "Clearly you donot understand the scale and scope of these points." >>> Wrong.... and it is doubtful that someone - such as yourself - who can't even remember what he posts half the time, who knows so little of history or political economy, and worse still: who seems beset with some sort of recurrent paranoid delusions that appear to warp his perceptions and understanding of his very beanie-clad surroundings on a regular basis... is likely to be able to educate me in these areas.... >>> However, useful knowledge may be gained in even the most unlikely of environments... and I am always willing to listen to - and consider the arguments of - anyone who wishes to step forward and attempt to make a logical case... and that includes even you. >>> But, to step forward with argument and hope for civil and productive debate and discourse, it is best to employ well structured logics... a documented evidenciary base... and predictions drawn from your arguing position that are testable - instead of simply (and very non-productively) rambling with off-point incoherencies that are not even parsable, let alone explicable. >>> So, step forward if you have the mettle, and worthwhile, or at least unique, ideas to explore. Re: "Events occur and some event mean all bets are off the table and it's a new game. Whining over who made what bet before the event is waste." >>> Perhaps... but ignorance of historical facts which are precursors to our present day World is hardly a stable foundation upon which to build a future that can endure. Re: "What is the new game in town and what is your position." >>> On what?