Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Douglas Lapp who wrote (28917)	10/12/2002 2:24:19 PM
From: Jim Bishop	Respond to of 34075

I won't argue with any of that.

To: Douglas Lapp who wrote (28917)	10/12/2002 8:21:19 PM
From: Cytotekk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Doug, you are very right about your timeline. I remember. The CIMA did not start out as a dual trip. This trip was NOT intended to be a dual trip and I was not thrilled at the dual DD idea. I went with the program when it changed, I did not see any harm in it. So we did more than one company's DD with our nickle, big deal. I was upset that CIMA was banned, that is true. At the time I was not aware of the history of SUNR and it's officers. I did not see the big deal when the CIMA mission added another company. That was then, this is now. I am not thrilled with that exemployee either. I still think you guys overreacted to CIMA checking out SUNR property. C in O