Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (51827)	10/13/2002 10:11:07 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Whats wrong with letting him speak ? One may agree or disagree with his words, but why not let him speak ? Sure.. why not?? And why not let Bin Laden or Zawahiri address the UN General Assembly as well?? How about Larry Flynt??? Hugh Hefner?? Madonna?? Heck... why not let ME address the UN??? I have some important stuff to say... Hawk

To: kumar who wrote (51827)	10/13/2002 11:45:40 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Whats wrong with letting him speak ? Kumar, Arafat made his speech with a gun in a holster on his hip. >>>On November 13 1974, Arafat was treated by the United Nation as a head of state and given a rare chance to address the world's most auspicious forum. His appearance in the UN is remembered not only for its content - he demanded a Palestinian state - but for the fact that he was allowed to deliver his speech with a gun strapped to his waist.<<< dvjc.org And the leftists in Norway, who of course, are all "Anti-gun," gave this thug the "Peace Prize."