Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (153256)	10/13/2002 10:40:37 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1586292

So let's do something about Saudi Arabia, for goodness sake! I think we will. Bush is proceeding about this in a highly structured, well thought-out procession of events. And right now, we NEED the Saudis. Further, they are were not directly complicit in 9/11; your allegation that the Saudi regime funded 9/11 is based on pure speculation and there is no credible evidence to that effect. Even if Bush and Cheny are buddies with the oil producers over there, so what! This is a typical liberal commentary on Bush and Cheney. However, it is clear that Bush and Cheney have had no improper involvement with the oil industry after their election. I suppose it is natural for a liberal to be suspicious like this; however, I must point out that while Clinton administration officials were the most corrupt in history, there has been not the slightest evidence of corruption in the current administration. Do you not think it is appropriate to give them the presumption of innocence that you are so adamant should be given to others? The only incident involving Enron was a Clinton official calling asking for the Bush administration to [fraudulently] intervene, and the proposal was instantly refused. I'm not sure what else Bush can do. Your comments border on paranoid thinking.