Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (52149)	10/15/2002 9:46:42 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

And Perle and Wolfowitz really want to give tough inspections a chance, right? Even though it would throw a huge wrench in their grand plans for broad war and occupation in the mideast? "ZERO chance" is about right on that front. Perle and Wolfowitz don't believe that any inspections have a chance of disarming Iraq while Saddam Hussein is in power. There is, after all a track record of behavior here, which I see you are still ignoring. So the real functional choice is war or do nothing, or maybe do nothing but play games with inspections. We have also seen that Kofi Annan is foursquare behind 'do nothing', given this choice. Perle and Wolfowitz are not prepared to continue to do nothing, so they favor war. I presume you are in favor of doing nothing? Just keep spinning it, Nadine, that's your job. As gratuitous insults are yours?