SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (62681)10/15/2002 4:38:01 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
I mean condemning malice in this or that apparent instance where it is in play. And since malice is an act of will intending harm, the condemnation must be directed at the individual perpetrator. We discussed this sort of thing before. Anyway, one refrains from blaming someone on the premise that somehow he couldn't help it, which is sometimes true. But I would rather be mistaken treating someone as a responsible agent, and thus encouraging him to take responsibility, than by treating someone responsible as morally helpless, in most cases. I have had people thank me for treating them with enough respect to recriminate with them. It made them feel like they were responsible for their lives, not just objects of pity......



To: epicure who wrote (62681)10/15/2002 4:45:54 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 82486
 
"I think we should condemn malice, I just don't intend to blame people. There is quite a big difference."

How???

"It is difficult to have a discussion when the definitions appear to be shifting, and shifting rather wildly."

Are you blaming Neocon for that?