SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lee who wrote (24292)10/16/2002 12:57:23 PM
From: mcg404  Respond to of 74559
 
<<What aspect of Australian foreign policy or military action resulting in collateral damage would you blame for causing so many Australians to get blown up in Bali?>>

Have i missed the news linking Bali to Al Quaida or are you being as presumptuous as George Bush to think that every explosion in the world is tied to Al Quaida? (which it very well may be.) of course there are plenty of muslims there and we might as well call every one an al quaida member, right? how do we know? they don't appear to have uniforms...maybe a secret handshake? (g)

<<I am disgusted with many aspects of US foreign policy, but that is a separate matter, not the root cause of Al Quaida's campaign.>>

I didn't mean to imply it was or wasn't. Only questioning if military action was a good way to reduce future attacks.

and who are these reasonable people you allude to?



To: Steve Lee who wrote (24292)10/16/2002 12:58:17 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
<I am disgusted with many aspects of US foreign policy, but that is a separate matter, not the root cause of Al Quaida's campaign.>

What is?

DAK