Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thames_sider who wrote (5692)	10/16/2002 12:15:35 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6089

Thanks for your opinions and for answering my question.

To: thames_sider who wrote (5692)	10/17/2002 10:28:28 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6089

I agree with James (Marvin?), but would also add, that, even if SH is removed from the picture, the world may not be better off. It depends on what/who replaces him, as well as what the international consequences of a US invasion are. For instance, if China uses the same rational to take over North Korea or Vietnam, or even Iran, I doubt that the world would be better off. If Thamester's wand could sterilely remove SH alone, with no other people involved, we would be better off. If the price to remove him included a nuke from Iraq over the Saudi oil fields, or even their own, it would certainly put the world in a pickle. Rat