Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (308940)	10/16/2002 3:47:02 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That is a non-sequitur. An issue at a time is sufficient for an organization. Besides, groups like Birthright not only help place adoptions, instead of encouraging abortions, but also give classes in parenting and afford other support for new mothers. By the way, do you think we ought to euthanize the elderly to avoid abuse?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (308940)	10/16/2002 4:02:16 PM
From: Srexley	Respond to of 769670

"Anti-abortion groups shouldn't label themselves "pro-life"" What an idiotic thing to say. Let me know when the pro-abortion people change their label of "pro choice". One group is for the sanctity of life (hence the term "pro life", and one feels that women do not need to be responsible for their poorly made decision to get pregnant and should be able to "choose" to kill their own baby to eliminate said bad decision. Kind of funny that you think someone should have to meet a few "flapjack conditions" to be for the right of unborn children to be born and to call themselves pro life.