Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (52469)	10/16/2002 4:32:43 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Kramer's book Here is an entry from his Blog this month that is very telling on Mid East Studies, IMO. Wednesday, October 9, 2002. And Ottomanists Too? I never cease to be amazed by how thoroughly politicized Middle Eastern studies have become. From time to time, I am assured that this or that branch has escaped the problem. Ottoman studies are a case in point. You would think this rather esoteric field of endeavor might provide some respite, at least from Arab-Israeli differences. You would be wrong. Here is an excerpt from a review of Suraiya Faroqhi's much-touted Approaching Ottoman History: An Introduction to the Sources. The review, by the Israeli Ottomanist Ehud Toledano, finds much to fault in the book?last of all, >>>>the total absence of any reference to Israeli scholarship on the Ottoman Empire, which is really striking....If Faroqhi had only cited the most significant works by Israelis, and ignored the bulk for reasons of economy of space, I might have refrained from commenting, bowing, I suppose, to constraints of political correctness. However, this book makes no mention whatsoever of any works by Israeli scholars (I profusely apologize to the author if one has managed to sneak in unnoticed); that fairly large group of studies, not specifically noted for their poor quality, is simply yok [not there]. As it is hard to attribute this absence to some unfortunate, benign coincidence, one should not shy from sounding an alarm bell. Because Ottoman studies have remained almost completely free of the stifling politicization?due mainly to the Arab-Israeli conflict?that has poisoned the broader field of Middle Eastern studies, what appears as Faroqhi?s deliberate choice is an unwelcome and dangerous breach of accepted academic norm that must remain an isolated case. In the little pond of Ottoman studies, this is a very weighty charge indeed. But it demonstrates a fact known to all Israeli scholars: long before some academics hostile to Israel began to call for its boycott, many in Middle Eastern studies began to banish Israelis from footnotes, bibliographies, and syllabi. That this quiet boycott reaches as far as a major reference text in Ottoman studies speaks volumes for the climate that pervades Middle Eastern studies generally.<<<< One hopes that Toledano is right, and that this is an "isolated case." I would not be surprised to learn that it isn't. martinkramer.org