SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (52470)10/16/2002 4:48:53 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
Bill, my taste in history is for very well written books filled with original research


"Nothing like in the World" was good for me, but I can see where you would consider it a bit of a "Cut and Paste." D-Day is not like that. Ambrose tells of the time, as a young professor, being interviewed by Ike at his Gettysburg office. Ike asked him, since he was teaching in New Orleans, if he knew Higgens. Ambrose replied that he didn't. Ike said, "Too Bad, we could not have won the war without him." Armbrose then goes on the explain what Higgins did.

You get this kind of personal stuff all the way through.



To: JohnM who wrote (52470)10/17/2002 2:54:11 AM
From: KLP  Respond to of 281500
 
Speaking of books and FA...Alexandria Library Rises Again
By Andrew Hammond, Reuters

CAIRO (Oct. 16) - Egypt officially reopens this week one of the first and most celebrated centers of learning in human history -- the library of Alexandria whose ancient roots stretch back more than 2,000 years.

President Hosni Mubarak and some 3,000 dignitaries from around the world, including France's President Jacques Chirac, President Carlo Ciampi of Italy and Greece's President Costis Stephanopoulos, will attend the opening ceremony on Wednesday.

Officially called the ''Bibliotheca Alexandrina,'' the resurrected library reflects all the ambition of a bold 20-year project costing $200 million with backing from the U.N. cultural body UNESCO and numerous countries.

The 11-story edifice -- on the spot where scholars believe the ancient library stood before it was destroyed -- emerges from the ground as a giant disc tilting 20 degrees north toward the Mediterranean and forming a striking image when directly aligned with the sun.

Its southern-facing, windowless wall of granite carries engraved letters of most of the world's alphabets, a silent pledge to promote diversity, culture and unfettered learning.

Controversy has dogged the project since the beginning, from claims that valuable antiquities from the original Greek city of Alexandria were destroyed in the construction, to criticism that it amounted to an expensive gimmick which in itself does little to improve education in a developing country of 68 million.

But developments in information technology have offered the library a way out of the almost impossible task of building up a collection from scratch to rival the world's major libraries.

An initial target of eight million books has been shelved for a new focus on creating a state-of-the-art cyber-library, says the library's high-profile director, Ismail Serageldin.

''How many books you have is not that relevant. The issue of being at the forefront of building an electronic library becomes more relevant, and that's one of the reasons why we want to jump forward in the electronic realm,'' he said.

SPECIAL FOCUS

The library will also focus on certain areas of specialization, backed up by holding major global seminars on issues in various fields of knowledge.

It has a lot to live up to. Previous luminaries included Archimedes, Euclid, Eratosthenes, St. Mark and Manetho, who established today's system of classifying Egypt's Pharaonic dynasties.

The first effort at collection and classification of universal knowledge, the great library set up after Alexander the Great established the city in 332 BC saw the first translation of the Old Testament from Hebrew to Greek.

''We're looking for niches that can complement our work: the Mediterranean area, Arab world, sub-Saharan Africa, and ethics of science and technology,'' said Serageldin, a former vice chairman of the World Bank and candidate to head UNESCO.

''There are three things where we plan to be the best in the world and I will compete to be the best in the world in: the library has got to be the reference point on the ancient library, on Alexandria and on Egypt,'' he added.

DIFFICULT TIMES

The library's hope to become a new beacon of knowledge and understanding comes at a critical time in the Middle East.

Religious extremism has been on the rise in the Middle East in recent decades, casting an unwelcome spotlight on the region. Most of the alleged planners, backers and attackers of September 11 were Arabs, and many of them were Egyptians.

Violence also continues to plague the Middle East. An official opening planned earlier this year was delayed because of tension over Israel's attempts to crush a Palestinian uprising.

The liberal, Europeanized city which formed the backdrop for Lawrence Durrell's classic ''Alexandria Quartet'' novels and its tales of the twisted lives and loves of foreign and local elites has changed dramatically over the last 50 years.

Islamic groups are strong in a now sprawling city of six million whose economy struggles in the face of Cairo's domination. Egypt as a whole has become more conservative in recent decades and critics bemoan declines in public debate and civil society.

CENSORSHIP FEARS

But the government has tried to assuage fears that a wave of book censorships could affect the library by awarding it a special status which makes it answerable only to the presidency.

''My legal statutes are very clear -- they give me the right, the obligation...to collect all the product of the human mind. I do not expect much of a hassle,'' said Serageldin, an architect who has written on topics from Shakespeare to biotechnology.

''If you, as a devout fundamentalist Muslim, want to repudiate the Satanic Verses (of author Salman Rushdie), where would you get a copy?'' he said, adding that many countries were witnessing debates on the proper limits of artistic and scientific endeavor.

''In the United States, people are debating whether Huckleberry Finn gives a stereotyped view of blacks. In some states you're forbidden to teach evolution,'' Serageldin said.

David Wardrop, a member of a worldwide network of experts who advised the library on acquisitions policy, said he was satisfied it would rise above censorship.

''The Egyptian parliament has ceded to the library's director such decision-making, who, by similar decree, is responsible only to the head of state. So, no national or local interfering,'' he said.

''Anyway, we feel the major components of the new library's collection will tend not to involve such sensitivities.''

INTOLERANCE LED TO LIBRARY'S DEMISE

Alexandrians think the library could do a lot to revive the fortunes of the city that houses one of the seven wonders of the ancient world, the Pharos lighthouse.

''People are very excited about it and everyone feels it is an asset,'' said radio announcer Hanan Samaha. ''The library is encouraging cultural activities and encouraging children to come. This is something that has been missed in Alexandria.''

Ironically, the original library saw its demise in an era of religious zealotry similar to that which greets its rebirth.

Philosopher and mathematician Hepatia, the library's last scholar, became an early martyr to learning when a Christian mob killed her in 415 AD as a symbol of a hated pagan era.

Modern Egyptian history is also replete with cases of thinkers who have had to endure exile, violence, prison and heavy censorship for their scholarship.

An Egyptian academic who argued for an allegorical reading of the Koran was forcibly divorced from his wife in 1996 on the grounds that his theories proved he was no longer a Muslim, and thus could not remain married to his Muslim wife.

Egypt's Nobel laureate author Naguib Mahfouz was stabbed by radical youths in 1995 because of a novel which the religious establishment had slammed as blasphemous.

The authorities have since prosecuted a number of people for forming groups which held unorthodox views on central Islamic tenets concerning prayer, pilgrimage and fasting.

Since the U.S. ''war on terror'' was unleashed after the September 11 attacks last year, some authorities in Egypt and other Arab and Muslim countries have feared that predictions of a clash of civilizations between East and West were coming true.

Egypt hopes the library could help counter such tensions.

''The Alexandrina returns to revive the spirit of tolerance and sharing human knowledge,'' the major daily newspaper al-Akhbar said in an editorial this week.

Reuters 13:47 10-16-02



To: JohnM who wrote (52470)10/17/2002 7:41:03 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
Persistent Carter deserves prize

By MARIANNE MEANS
SYNDICATED COLUMNIST
Thursday, October 17, 2002

WASHINGTON -- It sure is nice to know that good guys don't always finish last.

The idealistic crusade for global human rights that marked Jimmy Carter's administration couldn't rescue his mediocre presidency from defeat 22 years ago. But his winning the Nobel Peace Prize last week demonstrates that humanitarian concerns have an honored place, even if it's not necessarily in the White House.

In the Bush administration, human rights, in particular, have not been a high priority except when used as a moral stick to beat up on hostile regimes like those of Iraq's Saddam Hussein, and the former Taliban regime in Afghanistan.

Carter, 78, won the prestigious Nobel the old-fashioned way: He earned it. Even President Bush, no big Carter fan, called to say graciously that the award was long overdue.

It's clear that a former president has more latitude to do good works for their own sake than a sitting head of state, who is obligated to keep in mind the complicated political ramifications of his every word and deed.

Bush prefers tough talk to Carter's conciliatory approach, which admittedly has had mixed results despite the former president's good intentions. In Bush's view, rogue nations regard most international overtures as a sign of weakness to be exploited, and therefore such moves are counterproductive. He is reluctantly seeking a new U.N. resolution of support for military action against Iraq, but only to quiet a clamor from domestic and foreign leaders demanding that he do so.

Carter has been so assertively independent that periodically he has irritated each of his White House successors. But tensions between Carter and Bush are especially high.

Carter, asked after winning the Nobel how he might have voted on the issue of authorizing war against Iraq had he been in the Senate, said briskly, "I would have voted no. I think we should wait for the United Nations to act first."

The chairman of the Norwegian Nobel panel, Gunnar Berge, in fact, bluntly revealed that Carter won the prize in part because he has been critical of Bush's bellicose foreign policy.

Carter has never been shy about challenging Bush. A goodwill mission to Cuba in May, for instance, turned into a heated confrontation. Carter urged Fidel Castro to allow more human rights and personal freedom, but he also called on the Bush administration to end the 40-year-old U.S. trade embargo on the island.

The White House tried to undermine Carter's trip to Cuba. On the same day that he arrived there, Undersecretary of State John Bolton, seeking to alarm Americans about Castro's evil ways, said in Washington that Cuba has "at least" a limited research and development program of offensive biological weapons. He further claimed that the island nation already has supplied the relevant technology to unidentified "rogue states" suspected of terrorism.

Bolton offered no evidence to back up his attack. Its timing was clearly meant to make Carter look naive and to bolster the president's unyielding support for the embargo.

Carter said that Bolton's scary scenario was news to him. He said that during his pre-trip briefings by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and others, he had asked repeatedly if Cuba had shared any information useful to terrorists with any other country. "And the answer from our experts on intelligence was no," Carter said.

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer flatly denied that. "This question of bioweaponry was not raised by President Carter or brought up by Dr. Rice," he blustered. The president's rude mouthpiece did not apologize for essentially calling the former president a liar. But few people believed Fleischer anyway. Carter, who ran for president in 1976 promising he would never lie to us, has a reputation for being a truthful man.

Secretary of State Colin Powell was sufficiently disturbed by the ruckus to back away from Bolton's remarks. "We didn't say that Cuba actually had some weapons but it has the capacity and the capability to conduct such research," Powell said.

Well, big deal. So does practically every civilized nation on Earth.

Carter was right to go to Cuba. And he was right to urge an end to an outdated embargo at a time when free trade is supposed to be a universal goal and barriers against other unfriendly countries have been falling.

But this dispute was a good example of how things can look different from inside the White House and outside it. Carter was free to state his case on the merits alone. Opening trade would be good for everyone in the long run.

Bush had to think more narrowly of the political impact on the stoutly anti-Castro Cuban community of 650,000 voters in Miami where his brother, Jeb, is running for re-election as Florida's governor. Opening trade could hurt Jeb's short-term prospects.

It's a shame other retired presidents have preferred the joys of the golf course over the hard work of mediating entrenched disputes in odd corners of the world. By contrast, Carter has persistently and patiently pursued ways to improve the lives of the poor, bring nations together and advance democratic principles.

When he came to the White House with little national political experience, he was unprepared to govern the country, and he made a hash of it. But he was superbly prepared for the Nobel. In a sense, he has been working toward it for 22 years.

___________________________________________________

Marianne Means is a Washington, D.C., columnist with Hearst Newspapers. Copyright 2002 Hearst Newspapers. She can be reached at 202-298-6920 or means@hearstdc.com

seattlepi.nwsource.com



To: JohnM who wrote (52470)10/17/2002 9:33:57 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
GEORGE BUSH IS NO JACK KENNEDY

By Richard Reeves
Columnist
Universal Press Syndicate
October 14, 2002

WASHINGTON -- These were the options presented President John F. Kennedy by his chief notetaker, Theodore Sorensen, after the first secret White House meetings on possible reaction to the discovery that the Soviet Union was in the process of putting missiles into Cuba forty years ago this week:

"Track A -- Political action, pressure and warning, followed by military strike if satisfaction is not received...

"Track B- A military strike without warning, pressure or action....

"Track C -- Political action, pressure and warning, followed by a total naval blockade...

"Track D- Full scale invasion..."

That was on October 16, 1962. The American people and the world knew nothing of the Soviet attempt to put the United States directly under the nuclear gun, as the Soviet Union had been for a decade. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushev was gambling that with one bold and secret stroke he could gain a rough parity of terror with the United States by placing thirty or so medium-range missiles ( 300 to 1,100 miles) within ninety miles of Key West, Florida.

It was a rational plan -- as Kennedy himself later conceded -- for the leader of a country facing more than 5,000 deliverable American nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union had less than 300 then, most of which could only be delivered by bombers, which would have to evade American air defenses arrayed from the North Pole to the Midwest.

"You have surrounded us with military bases," Khrushchev had said to Kennedy’s Secretary of the Interior, Stewart Udall, earlier in 1962. Indeed. During the two weeks of eyeball-to-eyeball crisis, the United States had more than 200 intercontinetal missiles cocked for firing, a dozen Polaris submarines headed toward Soviet waters, each one carrying twelve nuclear missiles, sixty B-52s carrying 196 hydrogen bombs in the air with 628 more, carrying 2,026 bombs,ready to take off in only a few minutes.

Six days after that, with the CIA telling him that the missiles in Cuba would be operational within one to two weeks, Kennedy was ready to go public. The notes of the speech he planned to make on television began: "An airstrike means a U.S.-initiated ‘Pearl Harbor’ on a small nation which history could neither understand nor forget."

Kennedy, we know, chose "Track C", a blockade of Cuba, called "a quarantine" because blockade is legally and act of war. The world bereated shallowly for a week as Kennedy and Khrushchev manuevered in public and private. Throughout those fearsome days, the American president repeated a single line to his men, many of whom favored invasion or all-out bombing of Cuba: "We are very,very close to war and there’s not room in the White House shelter for us all... I don’t want to put Khrushchev in a corner...We don’t want to push him into precipitous action."

The two politicians finally worked it out. The guns were lowered, essentially because neither of them wanted to be remembered forever as the man who pushed the button. In one of the key sentences in the Khrushchev letter to Kennedy that was the beginning of the end of the crisis, the Soviet leader, usually portrayed as a madman in the American press, wrote:

"Do you seriously think that Cuba can attack the United States and that even we together with Cuba can attack you from the territory of Cuba? Can you really think that way...You can regard us with distrust, but, in any case you can be calm in this regard, that we are of sound mind and understand perfectly well that if we attack you, you will respond in the same way...Only lunatics or suicides, who themselves want to perish and to destroy the world before they die, could do this."

Now, forty years later, President George W. Bush has invoked the Cuban Missile Crisis to justify his moves against a country that may have the potential to build primitive nuclear weapons. He should read more history before his chooses a different track than Jack Kennedy did.
_______________________________________________

RICHARD REEVES, author of President Nixon: Alone in the White House (October 2001), is a writer and syndicated columnist who has made a number of award-winning documentary films. His ninth book, President Kennedy: Profile of Power — now considered the authoritative work on the 35th president — won several national awards and was named the Best Non-Fiction Book of 1993 by Time. His other best selling books include Convention and American Journey: Travelling with Tocqueville in Search of American Democracy.

Recipient of the 1998 Lifetime Achievement Award from the National Society of Newspaper Columnists, Reeves writes a twice-weekly column that appears in more than 100 newspapers. He is a former chief political correspondent for The New York Times and has written extensively for numerous magazines, including The New Yorker, The New York Times Magazine, Esquire and New York.

richardreeves.com