Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (24303)	10/16/2002 9:35:12 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

< The point of all this is his holiness says defending ourselves is wrong but doesn't offer an alternative. > No he doesn't... bombing another country isn't defending yourself. <As far as Bush going around the world etc. Well that IS an alternative that could be debated. I would hate to wait two decades for the attacks to stop.> It all depends on the alternative... doing the right thing long term is the only real 'right thing'... whether the attacks stop for a while or not. <BTW just to set the record straight I believe the nuclear bombing of civilian populations during WW 11 dims anything done by terrorists today to insignificance...> Sounds like 'turn the other cheek' isn't such a wrong alternative in that light. DAK