SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (1283)10/28/2002 7:16:15 AM
From: Mr. Forthright  Respond to of 37201
 
LONG LIVE THE NATIONAL POST - THANK YOU LORD BLACK

<<4 years on, a changed landscape
Post has improved Canadian papers, public policy

Kenneth Whyte, Editor-in-Chief
National Post

Monday, October 28, 2002

Early in 1998, in a telephone conversation a few hours before it was officially announced that a new national newspaper would be launched in Canada, Conrad Black reviewed once again the thinking behind the project and reached the following conclusion:

"Who knows how it will end up? We may fall flat on our faces. We may just surprise everyone and be a howling success. But, whatever happens, it will be an honourable thing to have done."

To be honest, there have been particular moments -- usually involving quarterly statements or layoffs forced by economic necessity -- when the whole project has seemed not so much honourable as preposterous. The fight has been longer and more difficult than any of us anticipated. But like any great venture, this one must be judged not by a single point in time but over the long haul, and from the vantage point today of our fourth anniversary, I think all involved would agree that we are blessed to be a part of it.

Young as it is, the National Post has to be accounted a howling success, even if the howling comes mostly from our competitors. It is Canada's third-largest English-language newspaper, with an intelligent and passionate readership of some two million people a week; it has gained a stubborn foothold for the Southam news company in the crowded Toronto market, and outside of Toronto it is Canada's preferred national newspaper (proving our contention that so far as most Canadians were concerned, we had no truly national newspaper before the Post's launch).

The Post has been credited, even by other newspapers, with bringing to Canada a new style of journalism, one both intelligent and entertaining. Through our newspaper and magazine journalism and our fabulous design, we have won more national and international awards than any other Canadian paper over the last four years.

It has always been part of the Post's mission to challenge a certain complacency in Canadian public affairs by introducing fresh perspectives and ambitious ideas to the national conversation. Our leadership in this regard has never been more apparent than last week when the Chrétien government finally announced it would bring in an ethics commissioner reporting directly to Parliament, and Paul Martin introduced a proposed package of Parliamentary reforms broadly in line with what we've been urging since our inception.

The Post has also campaigned for more backbone in Canadian foreign policy; for the rescue of our underfunded and demoralized military; for less onerous personal and corporate taxes; and for measures to improve our flagging standard of living. We keep these issues alive and in the face of our governments for one overarching reason: We have high hopes and high standards for Canada; we believe Canadians deserve nothing less.

Of course, there is more to the Post than public affairs. Much of the spirit of the paper lies in its curiosity and wonder at the world around us and the way we live now. The Post has an unabashed love of a great human interest story, and it is always ready to laugh, express outrage, or otherwise wear its heart on its sleeve.

Unique among Canadian journalistic institutions, the Post can also make fun of itself. In a perverse way, one of our proudest moments was this year's celebration of our 1,000th edition: a glorious two-page spread of all our mistaken calls, fatuous opinion, and misguided enthusiasms, including 258 mentions of Anna Kournikova, despite the fact she has never won a pro singles tennis tournament.

This anniversary, like any other, is an opportunity for gratitude. We would like to thank the many passionate readers who cheer, berate, challenge and stick with us every day. Also our growing collection of advertisers: We appreciate your commitment and we trust that the Post will continue to deliver even more for you in the months and years ahead.

We are grateful to Lord Black for his original vision, investment, and leadership, and also to the Asper family, which has not merely respected the integrity of the Post but urged us to reach higher. Under CanWest management, the Post has eliminated more than three quarters of its annual losses and it now stands, with growing circulation and improving ad revenues, tantalizingly close to profitability. (It is worth noting that this has been achieved despite our major competitor, backed by the richest man in Canada and the phone company, abusing its bottom line to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars in thwarted efforts to put us under.)

Above all else today, I want to pay tribute to the writers and editors of the National Post, the greatest collection of journalistic talent in the country -- men and women who despite the sometimes daunting nature of this project fear nothing more each day than producing a page that might bore or otherwise disappoint our readers.

The Post is not a newspaper anyone grew up reading. It is not anyone's hometown paper. It can't count on habit or inertia to keep it going. Moreso than any title in the country, it lives by its wits, stands on its merits and earns its readership each day. Along with their colleagues who produce, sell and manage the Post, our journalists embody that same spirit of enterprise we seek as a newspaper to promote throughout Canada. The National Post has always been their "honourable thing," and it will be for many years to come.

© Copyright 2002 National Post >>




nationalpost.com



To: Eashoa' M'sheekha who wrote (1283)11/1/2002 8:12:00 AM
From: Mr. Forthright  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37201
 
Canada: an unhappy and unreliable participant in the war against terror.

<<Coddling Hezbollah


National Post

Friday, November 01, 2002

Last December, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, Ottawa passed a law requiring government officials to create an authoritative list of banned terrorist organizations. The result was a joke: It took the government seven months to create the list, and it contained only seven groups. Hamas was left off, as was Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Basque terrorist group ETA, the Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka and the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades. So too was Hezbollah, which is arguably the most dangerous terrorist outfit in the world.

At the time we blamed the glaring omissions on political correctness. In a July editorial, we noted: "All seven of the cited groups are either directly affiliated with al-Qaeda, or share Osama bin Laden's apocalyptic creed. The ETA, the Tamil Tigers and the groups that target Israel, on the other hand, have concrete revanchist or nationalist agendas -- and thus qualify, in certain circles, as 'freedom fighters.' "

The events of the past few weeks show that our explanation was incomplete: It is not just political correctness but also ignorance and indifference that guide Canada's anti-terrorism policies.

At last month's Francophonie summit in Beirut, Jean Chrétien found himself on the same guest list as Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. But the PM saw no reason to treat the man -- whose group has killed about 370 Americans -- as anything other than a run-of-the-mill dignitary. When asked if he had a problem with Nasrallah's presence, the PM signalled he really had no idea who the guy was -- and that he didn't particularly care in any event. "You know, we were in a country. So they invite people," he told reporters. "We're civilized. You know, I'm not asking passports and CVs of anybody. So I look at them and if they shake hand I shake hand."

This week, the National Post's Stewart Bell reported on the fruits of Canada's see-no-evil approach to Hezbollah. According to documents obtained from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, Hezbollah has used Canadian banks to launder its funds -- applying the proceeds toward equipment and weapons. Hezbollah is parking its operatives here, too. This week, the Israeli government released details on Fauzi Ayub, a captured Canadian citizen who, the Israelis allege, travelled to Hebron to set up Hezbollah safe houses and arms caches.

Meanwhile, Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Graham continues to justify Canada's policy of permitting Hezbollah's "non-military" arms to raise funds in this country. "We don't believe it would be appropriate to label as terrorists innocent doctors, teachers and other people who are seeking to do charitable and other good works in their communities," said Mr. Graham yesterday.

This is an absurd rationale. It is not just Hezbollah's military arm but its entire political, social and propaganda apparatus that is oriented toward the destruction of Israel and the disruption of the Israeli/Palestinian peace process. Nasrallah and his Iranian paymasters control everything, and it is naive to think that funds, equipment and personnel are not intermingled.

All this shows it is wrong to dismiss Mr. Chrétien's Beirut comments as a mere gaffe. Nothing better captures the half-hearted character of our government's campaign against terrorism than a Prime Minister who doesn't know, or care about, keeping company with one of the world's elite terrorists.

In France, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Argentina and the other countries that have been targeted by Hezbollah, the battle against terror is serious business. Lives hang in the balance, and Canada is putting those lives at greater risk by refusing to name Hezbollah a terrorist group or completely shut down the organization's fundraising efforts in this country. This is a matter that affects Canadians too: Just as many Australians were killed in last month's Bali bombing, so too might scores of our citizens be lost in the next blast. That Ottawa seems ready to wait for that blast before getting serious about shutting down terrorists is inexcusable.

© Copyright 2002 National Post>>