Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : DC Sniper - Theories? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (1099)	10/17/2002 7:33:59 AM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2746

You did not leave a link ,nor did you quote a source. The natural implication then,is its your opinion. Perhaps that implication is "natural" via your unique brand of retardation. To anyone with an education surpassing that of a fifth grade level, though, posing a hypothesis doesn't - by any means - automatically imply agreement with or support of the motives or actions one is attempting to explain. How do YOU know why a profile was withheld? How are you ("YOU"?) reading any suggestion of certainty in my post? I obviously don't know; I can only pose hypotheses and make assertions to that effect, which is what I did. I first thought you didn't know the difference between a hypothesis and an opinion; do you even know what a hypothesis is, and what function it serves? You do realize that the title of this thread is "DC Sniper - Theories," don't you? [Y]ou insisted an AK-74 couldn't shoot a .243 cartridge[.] LOL. No, ".243" cartridges weren't mentioned once. We were talking about .22 vs. .223 and 5.45mm vs. 5.56mm; moreover, the below (and most recent) link on that topic hardly suggests "insist[ence.]" Message 18120894 You are way too wrapped up in the appearance of intelligience [sic]. ROFL! Priceless! Chill out and try to write with a more lucid style,rather than your strained and annoying psuedo-arrogance. I'm very sorry if you can't keep up, and I can understand that it must be frustrating for you. But no, I'm not going to put a literary or logical equivalent of training wheels on my posts to dumb them down just for you. No one else has any trouble understanding them, and given that your definition of "lucid" seems to suggest posts rife with misspellings, odd syntax, non sequitir responses, and an utter lack of reading comprehension behind them, I think you're well-relegated to a slim minority grasping to comprehend. Good luck with that. LPS5