Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FaultLine who wrote (52582)	10/17/2002 6:04:02 AM
From: zonder	Respond to of 281500

Pray tell why? :)

To: FaultLine who wrote (52582)	10/17/2002 10:28:22 AM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 281500

Well, all of humanity may be stretching it, but as someone with a scientific background, how do you compare what comes up with google.com or directory.google.com to the 5 citations LindyBill came up with in #reply-18118955 ? Even the soundest "politically correct" science has to have better "debunkers" than nickyee.com and some random biblical science type. And it's not like I don't think there were problems with the CFC program. Astonishingly, about 25 cents worth of a propane and butane mixture is a perfectly good replacement for an R12 auto AC charge that will cost you probably $300-$500 to get replaced these days, if not more. But what happened there has a lot more to do with the usual regulations written at the behest of the regulatees than it has to do with "eco-nuts". Though of course there was an element of 60 Minutes / Dateline NBC "science" involved in suppressing the cheap alternative there too.