SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (62812)10/17/2002 9:50:04 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
definitive?
I never said definitive. I am not looking for that;
I am looking for ambiguity.

I think you are being wooed Neo. You need not bash your head against a wall here, when you are desperately needed by others. I think I will leave you with your woo-eee.

I love the way woo-ee sounds. I'm a agonna leave it that thar way



To: Neocon who wrote (62812)10/17/2002 10:19:01 AM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I am sure Mr. Miller wrote it meaning to suggest a Catholic like church

is what X said. And so is pretty much everyone else sure that Mr. Miller meant to suggest a Catholic-like church. So really, since no novelists suggest anything with their literary creations and metaphors except those that are thing-like, why doesn't it settle the discussion?

It's about "a Catholic-like church," all agree. It's not about the Catholic church -- because of course if fifty novelists set out to write fifty novels about "the" Catholic church, they would on scrutiny turn out to be about fifty different churches with the same name.

The Catholic church, iow, isn't "the" Catholic church. But it's close enough so we're able to use the phrase and not confuse the entity being discussed with the Mennonite Central Committee. Mr. Miller didn't mean to suggest a Mennonite-like church.

As usual, I haven't read many of the posts about this, so possibly this has already been said.