Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (153515)	10/17/2002 1:32:11 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583643

Tell you what...I prefer that and the occasional BJ in the WH to a perpetual state of war by Jerry Falwell's disciples in pursuit of some obscure, dubious "Mohamed was a terrorist" goal. I see they put the fear of Allah in his a$$ I have no problem with BJ's in the WH, and if I lived there, well ... And I think Falwell's statements were totally inappropriate. So I guess we agree on something. What we probably don't agree on is I never want to see another compulsive liar in the White House; but it apparently didn't bother you having Clinton there.

To: Alighieri who wrote (153515)	10/17/2002 4:38:06 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583643

I prefer that and the occasional BJ in the WH to a perpetual state of war by Jerry Falwell's disciples in pursuit of some obscure, dubious "Mohamed was a terrorist" goal. I don't really care about BJ's in the white house (even though BJ's at your place of work can normally get you in trouble) but perjury by the president bothers me. And yes he probably should not have had to answer the question he lied about but he signed the law that allowed for such questioning. What is it good enough for everyone else but shouldn't apply to him? As for Jerry Falwell's disciples or trying to claim that Mohamed was a terrorist I don't know what your talking about. Perhaps Falwell made such a claim but he isn't president. Neither Bush nor any of his cabinet members or senior advisors has made any such claim to my knowledge. As for the more general idea of perpetual war, Clinton got us involved in more conflicts then Bush has despite the fact that that the threat to the US was somewhat less obvious during the Clinton years. Tim