SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (148839)10/17/2002 2:39:20 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
I think it's time for you to show us that.



To: GST who wrote (148839)10/17/2002 2:49:33 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Geez, you're just gonna keep changing your story until you hit on something true (completely by accident, surely), aren't you? First you say "the US cannot go to war without the UN say-so." Next, you claimed there was some body of international law that Bush would be breaking if he invaded Iraq without UN authority. Then you claimed there were UN resolutions "specifically precluding" any invasion. Now you say that no resolution authorizes it. Do you really think these are equivalent statements?



To: GST who wrote (148839)10/21/2002 3:38:32 AM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
i'm just glad you finally came right out and exposed your pathetic globalist agenda for the united states. according to you the united states should hand over our sovereignty to the UN. we should defer to the 'international law' of the UN. apparently you feel the UN charter supercedes the US constitution.

if you are an american, you are a worthless and undesirable one at that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News