Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (309512)	10/17/2002 7:47:39 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Well Karen please explain yourself. What I have said is correct and logical and a totally proper answer to a question posed by buddy who has been mis quoting my posts and lying about what I have said in the past. I'd suggest your opinion is based upon your very limited ability to think. I have said nothing that is not a declaration of reality and the law. If you wish to be made a fool, take a stab at showing anything I've said is not completely rational. Have you got dirt in your eyes and between your ears. That's not what I mean by saying dirt can vote. karen if you claim you have the right to vote, then all I have said is logical and true.

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (309512)	10/17/2002 8:38:30 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

<LOL!!!!> Either insane like you say... or else just down-right ornery and stuck-up, refusing to back down in public from even the most ridiculous of statements (like his repeated claim that Bush won the 2000 election with a 16 million vote margin), nor admit to the slightest error (his quote "I'm always 100% correct") even when it becomes blatantly obvious to everyone that he can't back up these assertions with anything resembling facts or sources. When challenged to provide proof, or even to define his terms so we can know what he thinks he's saying (could you tell us what you consider a "vote" to be?) he invariably ignores the request... and then changes the subject. His next step is inevitably to call the questioner names... 'liar', etc., whatever disjointed insult seems to spring into his mind and emerge in his fractured syntax - by which he probably hopes to distract other readers from his own inability or refusal to answer questions, or engage in honest debate . His final resort is usually to spamming. He cuts and pastes the same comments over and over, I guess until everyone else on the thread gets tired of reading them... and in the process looses track of the fact that he never even tried to prove his claims.... Ah, well... 'insane' or ornery provocateur, it all reads pretty much the same. What I think he fails to realize is that by adopting such non-productive and ultimately boring tactics... along the way even his supposed political compatriots... start sending private messages saying they think he's 'troubled' or disingenuous.