Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (20403)	10/17/2002 8:05:16 PM
From: nspolar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

Why Doug .... I think you and I are on the same wavelength here. And even though I'm no big fan of GW he hit it right on the nose that Arafat must go. I think his (Arafat's) days are numbered. In part because as you as "You can't eat religion!"

To: Douglas V. Fant who wrote (20403)	10/18/2002 3:00:07 AM
From: c.hinton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

Why, realisticly speaking, is it more important to aid economicly afghanastan and iraq? I can only think of one reason, oil,its all about oil.If oil were not present and we did not want it, would there be a middle east problem that concerned us,would two jetliners have crashed into the world trade center? Re religion,You may not be able to eat it,but have you no idea of the suffereing people have been willing to bear in the name of their GOD AND THEIR BELIEFS.Geepers the puritans were fundamentalists were they not and what about Zionists?