SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (57018)10/18/2002 9:27:09 AM
From: J_K  Respond to of 209892
 
As long as the index trades above that levels a continuation of the rise is possible
I always laugh at silly statements like this.

How about as long as it stays below 900 further downside is possible.

M


Yeah, he would put it like this -G-



To: mishedlo who wrote (57018)10/18/2002 9:28:37 AM
From: The Freep  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
Mish, you can laugh, but one of the key elements of e-wave has to do with overlap of waves. If certain prices are violated, it changes the overall wave structure. That is what I think Onischka is talking about when he makes statements like that.

just mo,

the freep



To: mishedlo who wrote (57018)10/18/2002 10:23:39 AM
From: benchpress550  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Did anybody on the thread took their lunch money and brought qqq nov 23 puts around the open?



To: mishedlo who wrote (57018)10/18/2002 4:02:21 PM
From: NOW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
wasnt IBM max pain 75?
amazing....