SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (52863)10/18/2002 10:51:26 AM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 281500
 
If there was any doubt that a war with Iraq is all about oil, then the differential treatment between Iraq's maybe status on WMD and Korea's certain status, eliminates that doubt. Under the patriotic rhetoric lie dollars, pure and simple.

TP



To: stockman_scott who wrote (52863)10/18/2002 11:52:41 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
But what sense does it make to have a foreign policy that says we'll negotiate with North Korea, a state that is conceivably more of a threat because it already has such weapons, but we'll pre-emptively strike Iraq because we think it might be developing these weapons?

Is this woman such an imbecile that she can't figure out the answer to this question, or is she only pretending to be, in the service of arriving at her pre-ordained conclusion?



To: stockman_scott who wrote (52863)10/18/2002 12:50:50 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The reason the US is threatening to invade Iraq is to keep Iraq from developing nuclear weapons.

Korea already has nuclear weapons, so if we do invade Korea, they can use nuclear weapons against us or our allies, South Korea and Japan.

This is probably the main reason they decided to tell us.

How hard is it to understand this?