Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (148908)	10/18/2002 1:05:36 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

Oh, you... nitpicker. ;-)

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (148908)	10/18/2002 2:23:40 PM
From: GST	Respond to of 164684

I repeatedly underestimate your ignorance. There was no UN authority for an invasion of Iraq. There was no invasion. There is no authority for an invasion now. There is no legal basis for an invasion of Iraq -- not then, and not now. If we invade Iraq we would have the same legal standing as Iraq's invasion of Kuwait -- none whatsoever. You wrote to me "I suppose the invasion that followed was illegal under your savvy interpretation of "international law". What I am telling you is common knowledge to EVERYBODY who is even slightly familiar with the facts about Iraq, Kuwait, the UN and the US. You are simply too ignorant and poorly informed to have an intelligent opinion.