Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (53252)	10/19/2002 4:55:21 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

On one hand you say that attacks will have to stop if Israel withdraws, on the other you ignore the fact that attacks increased when Israel withdrew from Lebanon, and the two sides are at the verge of open warfare now. Then you have the gall to claim my arguments are poor? In one breath you say if Israel withdraws to 1967, the world will recognize them (though it didn't do so before 1967) in the other you talk about how Israel is a "vicious colonial state" that has stolen all its land. Tell me, do "vicious colonial states" have any acceptable borders? If you just argued openly for the destruction of Israel without all this posturing, it would at least be an honest argument.

To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (53252)	10/19/2002 5:17:00 PM
From: art slott	Respond to of 281500

"just as they(attacks) did in Lebanon" Somebody better tell the Israelis who are being fired upon.